A political action committee decided to poll its membership to determine if they were in favor of a certain potential law, similar to gun control. The results that came back were 125 in favor of the law, and 120 against. Given that the crew at the center would use the fact that the simple majority would win, Johnny Statman, said I don't think that is appropriate decision, and we really need to need to have our group oppose the law. How do you suppose he came up with that conclusion? What kind of analysis did he do to arrive at his decision

a scatter plot of the number of women in the workforce versus the number of Christmas trees sold in the United States for each year between 1930 and the present, you would find a very strong correlation. Does one cause the other? Why do you think this correlation might be true?

Johnny Statman likely arrived at his conclusion by conducting a simple majority analysis. To understand how he reached this decision, let's break down the process:

1. Gather the numbers: The poll results indicated that 125 members were in favor of the law, while 120 were against it.

2. Determine the majority: In a simple majority system, the decision is based on which side has more votes. In this case, the group would win if they had more than half of the votes.

3. Compare the numbers: To determine the majority, we sum up the votes for and against the law. The total number of votes is 125 (in favor) + 120 (against) = 245.

4. Calculate the percentage: Calculate the percentage of votes in favor of the law by dividing the number in favor by the total number of votes and multiply by 100: (125 / 245) * 100 ≈ 51.02%. The percentage of votes against the law is approximately (120 / 245) * 100 ≈ 48.98%.

5. Analyze the results: Since the group's decision is based on a simple majority, Johnny Statman noticed that the percentage of members in favor of the law is slightly above 50%. Considering the close margin, he may have concluded that opposing the law would align with the preference of the majority, as it is just under 50%.

It's crucial to note that the decision-making process may involve other factors beyond a simple majority analysis, such as underlying principles or values. But based solely on the majority rule, Johnny Statman likely arrived at the decision to oppose the law due to it not having a clear majority in favor.