which of the following is the best example of "negative evidence" for the claim," samsung makes excellent quality phones"?
A. 50.6 of htc evo users prefer evo to samsung's android.
B. the main competitors of samsung are htc,nokia and black barry.
C. 4 out of 5 samsung customers were able to use their original phone purchase for .7 years or more on average.
D. 42.3% of samsung A670 users reported problems with their cell phones within the first 30 days of use.
correct me if i'm wrong but i'm sure It's D .
I agree.
Yes, you are correct. Option D, "42.3% of Samsung A670 users reported problems with their cell phones within the first 30 days of use," is the best example of negative evidence for the claim that Samsung makes excellent quality phones.
To determine the best example of negative evidence, we need to consider which option provides information that undermines or contradicts the claim. Option A simply states a preference of HTC Evo over Samsung's Android, but it does not provide any evidence of negative quality. Option B mentions the main competitors of Samsung, but it does not directly address the quality of Samsung phones. Option C suggests that Samsung customers were able to use their phones for a significant amount of time, which could be seen as positive evidence for Samsung's quality.
Option D, however, directly addresses reported problems with Samsung A670 phones within the first 30 days of use. This information suggests that there are issues with the quality of Samsung phones, making it the best example of negative evidence.
In conclusion, option D is the best example of negative evidence for the claim that Samsung makes excellent quality phones.