I was wondering if I paraphrased correctly.
The original article is:(my work is at the end )
Known as the "Napoleon of the women's rights movement," Susan B. Anthony was the co-founder (with Elizabeth Cady Stanton) of the National Woman Suffrage Association. When she was arrested and fined $100 for casting an illegal vote in the 1872 presidential election, Anthony refused to pay, defending her actions in the speech that follows. Note her reliance on parallelism and antithetical structures to convey her forceful message.
On Women's Right to Vote
by Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906)
Friends and fellow citizens, I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.
The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
"We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people--women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government--the ballot.
For any state to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of one entire half of the people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post facto law, and is therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of liberty are forever withheld from women and their female posterity. To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household--which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.
Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several states is today null and void, precisely as is every one against Negroes.
my paraphrased work is :
Susan B. Anthony was arrested ,and fined for voting in the 1872 presidential election which was illegal for woman to participate in. she refused to pay the fine she defended ,and explained her act in a speech saying to the people , and citizens of the united states That she did not do anything wrong or illegal. She was supporting her country by precipitating in voting. That right was guaranteed to her and every American citizen to practice and nobody has the right to deny that our federal constitution says:
"We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Our constitution said we the people it didn't say we the men, white or black.
Our constitution said we the people all of us all the United States citizens none shall be left out, we are the people who formed the union to secure it. We equally formed it we need to all enjoy our rights equally. It is ridicules, to deprive, and deny woman to vote.
To us this government is ruled by a few elite citizens. To us woman this government isn’t a democracy or a republican it is a aristocracy government. Poor govern the rich, white govern black, and men govern woman. Shouldn't we vote aren't we people?
Your paraphrase of Susan B. Anthony's speech is mostly accurate, but there are a few areas where the meaning has been slightly altered or some points have been missed. Below is a revised and more accurate paraphrase:
Susan B. Anthony was arrested and fined for voting in the 1872 presidential election, which was illegal for women at the time. She refused to pay the fine and defended her actions in a speech, explaining that she did not believe she had committed a crime. She argued that as a citizen of the United States, she was entitled to exercise her rights, as guaranteed by the Constitution. Anthony highlighted that the Constitution was created by "the people," not just by white male citizens or men, but everyone, including women. She believed that it was a mockery to talk about the blessings of liberty while denying women the right to vote, as voting was the means to secure those liberties. Anthony criticized any state that made sex a qualification for voting, as it deprived women of their rights and went against the principles of democracy and republicanism. She drew parallels to other forms of discrimination, such as race and wealth, stating that an oligarchy of sex, where men ruled over women, caused dissension and rebellion. Anthony concluded by arguing that women were citizens and, therefore, should not be subjected to any laws that limited their privileges and immunities. She considered any discrimination against women in state constitutions and laws to be null and void, just as discrimination against African Americans was deemed unacceptable.
Remember, when paraphrasing, it is important to capture the main ideas and message of the original text while using your own words and sentence structures.
Your paraphrased work effectively summarizes the key points of the original article. However, there are a few areas where you could improve the clarity and structure of your sentences. Here is a revised version:
Susan B. Anthony, known as the "Napoleon of the women's rights movement," was arrested and fined for unlawfully casting a vote in the 1872 presidential election. However, she refused to pay the fine and instead defended her actions in a speech. Anthony argued that her vote was not a crime but rather the exercise of her citizen's rights, which are guaranteed to all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.
Anthony highlighted that the Federal Constitution, in its preamble, states that the Union was formed by "the people." She emphasized that this term did not exclude women and that the purpose of the Union was not merely to grant the blessings of liberty but to secure them for all citizens, including women. Anthony criticized the notion that women could be denied the use of the ballot, which she viewed as the only means provided by the government to secure these liberties.
According to Anthony, any state that makes sex a qualification for suffrage effectively violates the supreme law of the land and denies women and their female descendants the blessings of liberty. She compared this exclusion to a bill of attainder or an ex post facto law, asserting that it constitutes an oppressive aristocracy of sex. Anthony argued that this form of governance, where men hold power over women in every household, undermines the principles of democracy and republicanism.
Anthony also addressed the definition of a citizen, as provided by dictionaries such as Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier. She stated that since women are persons, they are also citizens entitled to vote and hold office. Thus, any discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the states is null and void, just as discrimination against African Americans is.
Overall, your paraphrase captures the main ideas of the original article, but it can be further refined to enhance clarity and coherence.