Could you please check these sentences, too? Thank you very much.
1) The witches were associated with the devil.
2) Once you told me I could use this sentence. The daffodils are described not statically as in a painting but alive with motion.
3) He shows the daffodils as part of a universal order, as growing where they do, just as the stars in the Milky Way are fixed in their courses, because of the natural law which dictates their existence.
4) Elizabeth was the last queen of th Tudor's dynasty.
2. Yes -- that sentence is preferable to the one in your last post.
3. OK
4. ... last queen of the Tudor dynasty.
OR
... last queen of the House of Tudor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tudor_dynasty
Sure! I'd be happy to check those sentences for you. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
1) The witches were associated with the devil.
- This sentence is grammatically correct and clear.
2) Once you told me I could use this sentence. The daffodils are described not statically as in a painting but alive with motion.
- This sentence is a bit confusing. Consider rephrasing it to improve clarity, such as:
- "Once you told me I could use this sentence: The daffodils are described not as static figures in a painting, but as vibrant with motion."
3) He shows the daffodils as part of a universal order, as growing where they do, just as the stars in the Milky Way are fixed in their courses because of the natural law which dictates their existence.
- This sentence is grammatically correct, but it's quite long and complex. To improve readability, you could break it down into two sentences:
- "He shows the daffodils as part of a universal order, growing where they do. This is similar to how the stars in the Milky Way are fixed in their courses due to the natural laws that govern their existence."
4) Elizabeth was the last queen of the Tudor dynasty.
- This sentence is grammatically correct and clear.
Overall, the sentences are mostly well-structured. Just a few small tweaks could enhance clarity and readability.