# Informal Logic

posted by .

Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then, construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form.

## Similar Questions

1. ### Critical Thinking

When you are building an arument for an issue that is significant to you, do you think it is more important to be sound or valid?
2. ### CRT205

Since it is the very nature of terrorism not only to cause immediate damage but also to strike fear in the hearts of the population under attack, one might say that the terrorists were extraordinarily successful, not just as a result …
3. ### critical thinking

Premise- Since most all disease can be effectively prevented by a healthy lifestyle. Conclusion-Animal activist sometimes contend that medical research is unneccessary. Is this a valid/sound argument or is this an ivalid/unsound argument?

Write four arguments that meet the following criteria: Argument 1: The argument has a false premise, but follows good logic. Argument 2: The argument has true premises, but follows poor logic, leading to a false conclusion. Argument …
5. ### philosophy

Truth tables can determine which of the following?
6. ### PHI 103

"All dogs hate cats. Sirius is a dog. So Sirius hates cats" is an example of a (Points : 1) sound inductive argument. valid deductive argument. invalid inductive argument. weak deductive argument. I am confused a little about this …
7. ### Logic

Truth tables can determine which of the following?
8. ### Phi

"You didn't like that book; so you probably don't like to read" is a weak inductive argument. a strong deductive argument. not an argument. a valid inductive argument.
9. ### PHI103

"10 is less than 100; 100 is less than 1,000; consequently, 10 is less than 1,000" is an example of a (Points : 1) sound deductive argument. valid inductive argument. sound inductive argument. weak inductive argument.
10. ### PHI103

Assume you are given a sound argument. What do you know about it?

More Similar Questions