To make supporting points it is important that one finds relevant, accurate, and reliable sources. What should you consider when looking for helpful sources? What are some red flags that indicate you should avoid a particular source?

http://lib.nmsu.edu/instruction/eval.html

Read through all the Criteria section. The explanations here are very clear.

When looking for helpful sources to make supporting points, there are several factors you should consider:

1. Relevance: Ensure that the source you choose is directly related to your topic. Look for sources that provide information, data, or arguments that support your point.

2. Accuracy: Consider the credibility and accuracy of the information in the source. Is the information well-supported, based on research or evidence? Check if the source is peer-reviewed, written by experts in the field, or published by reputable organizations.

3. Reliability: Evaluate the reliability of the source. Is it published on a trusted platform? Does the author have a history of providing reliable information? Look for sources that have a reputation for accuracy and trustworthiness.

4. Currency: Check if the information in the source is up-to-date and relevant to the current context. This is particularly important for topics that evolve quickly or for recent events.

5. Objectivity: Consider whether the source presents a balanced and unbiased perspective. Biased sources may have an agenda or a specific viewpoint they want to promote. Look for sources that present multiple sides of an argument or provide well-rounded information.

6. Consistency with other sources: Compare the information or arguments presented in the source with other reliable sources. If a particular source contradicts most others, it might be a red flag.

Now, let's discuss some red flags that indicate you should avoid a particular source:

1. Lack of credibility: If the source lacks authorship or affiliation with a reputable organization, it may not be trustworthy.

2. Poor quality or outdated design: An unprofessional or poorly designed website, full of grammatical errors or outdated information, may indicate a lack of care or credibility.

3. Extreme bias or sensationalism: Sources that exhibit extreme bias, promote conspiracy theories, or use sensationalist language are often unreliable.

4. Lack of citations or references: If a source doesn't provide references or citations to back up its claims, it is difficult to verify its accuracy.

5. False or misleading information: Be cautious of sources that contain false information or use misleading tactics to manipulate readers.

Remember, critically evaluating sources is crucial to ensure that you're using reliable and accurate information for your supporting points.