Make a list of the measures that Charles I used to avoid calling parliament. Beside each entry explain which classes of society would be the angriest about these measures and why. Came straight from the crossroads textbook :a meeting of nation.
How would we like us to help you?
Note: we do not have that or any textbook.
I would like you please to . explain how I am suppose to do this question. i don't understand what this question is asking for.
To create a list of the measures that Charles I used to avoid calling parliament and explain which classes of society would be the angriest about them, we can refer to historical context and sources such as the "Crossroads" textbook. Here are some possible measures implemented by Charles I and the societal classes likely to be the angriest about them, along with the reasons behind their discontent:
1. Forced Loans: Charles I resorted to demanding loans from wealthy individuals without parliamentary approval. They were expected to contribute financially to the King's needs, but without consent, which angered the nobility and gentry. These classes would be particularly upset because it undermined their control and authority over financial matters, as traditionally exercised through Parliament.
2. Ship Money: Charles I extended the collection of ship money, historically a tax levied on coastal towns during times of naval threat, to the whole country. This move increased the burden on the common people and merchants, as they were required to pay taxes to support the navy even though there was no imminent naval threat. This measure would have angered the lower classes, including merchants and urban residents, as it seemed like an unjustified and arbitrary tax without their representation in Parliament.
3. Forced Billeting: During times of conflict, Charles I forced people to provide food and lodging for soldiers without compensation. This measure primarily affected the lower classes, including peasants and laborers who bore the brunt of the burden. They would have been the angriest about this measure, as it strained their already limited resources, disrupted their daily lives, and infringed upon their personal liberties.
4. The Court of Star Chamber: Charles I relied heavily on the Court of Star Chamber, an administrative court known for its arbitrary practices, to suppress opposition and control dissent. This court had the power to imprison, fine, and punish individuals without due process. The nobility, gentry, and educated middle classes would have strongly resented this measure, as they prized the principles of traditional English common law, due process, and legal protection of their rights and liberties.
5. Personal Rule: Charles I attempted to rule without calling Parliament, using prerogative powers granted to the monarch. This not only deprived the nation of its representative and legislative body but also bypassed avenues for grievances and redress. The Parliament-loving sections of society, including the middle classes, merchants, and those who believed in the importance of balanced governance, checks, and accountability, would have been the angriest about this measure.
It is important to note that the level of anger and opposition among different classes of society may vary, and not everyone within each class would have held the same opinion. Nevertheless, these measures, combined with increasing dissatisfaction within society, played a significant role in escalating tensions and ultimately led to the English Civil War.