the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950. Is anyone willing and able to explain the significance of this act of Congress, including its intent and purpose, and how the law was widely considered to be a violation of civil liberties?

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS379US379&aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=McCarran+Internal+Security+Act+of+1950

The Wikipedia article will give you the best explanation.

You might also look up this: House Committee on Un-American Activities

The McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, formally known as the Internal Security Act of 1950, was enacted by the United States Congress and signed into law by President Harry S. Truman. Its intent and purpose revolved around addressing perceived threats to national security during the Cold War era, particularly concerns about communist infiltration and subversion within the country.

The key provisions of the Act can be summarized as follows:

1. Registration of Communist organizations: The Act required Communist groups and their members to register with the United States Attorney General, disclosing their identities and activities. Failure to register could lead to criminal penalties.

2. Investigation of Communist affiliations: The law empowered the Subversive Activities Control Board (SACB) to investigate organizations suspected of being subversive or having Communist affiliations. They could require witnesses to testify under oath, subpoena documents, and grant immunity to those who cooperated.

3. Detention of dangerous individuals during national emergencies: The Act permitted the detention of individuals deemed to be potentially dangerous during times of national emergency. Such detentions did not rely on traditional criminal proceedings but rather a preventive detention model.

The McCarran Internal Security Act was met with significant controversy and criticism, primarily due to concerns that it violated civil liberties. Some major points of contention include:

1. Suppression of freedom of speech and association: Critics argued that the act stifled political dissent and undermined First Amendment rights by forcing Communist organizations to disclose their members and activities. This requirement could be seen as fostering a climate of fear and mistrust, deterring individuals from engaging in legitimate political activities.

2. Guilt by association: The Act allowed for investigations into individuals' political and organizational affiliations without requiring proof of active involvement in illegal activities. This "guilt by association" approach alarmed civil liberties advocates who felt it contradicted the principle of presumption of innocence.

3. Suspicion-based preventive detention: The provision allowing preventive detention during national emergencies was seen as an infringement on due process rights. Concerns were raised that individuals could be detained indefinitely based on suspicion, rather than evidence of specific criminal activity.

Overall, the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950 was widely criticized for its encroachment on civil liberties, with opponents arguing that it undermined constitutional protections and created a climate of political repression. However, it should be noted that some proponents of the Act believed that the nation's security concerns justified these measures during a time of heightened tensions with communist forces.