Economics

posted by .

Budweiser (now owned by a Belgium based beer company), Miller and Coors who together produce 85% of all beer consumed in the US, each spend well over $250 million a year on television advertising campaigns, promoting their beer brands. Obviously, if one firm is advertising its brands heavily, the others must also advertise to defend their market shares.

Do you think these firms would welcome congressional legislation which restricted the amount that any one firm could spend on advertising to $1 million yearly, and thereby allowed them all to drastically reduce their costs without fear of losing ground to each other? Are wireless telephone companies in the US market pursuing this scenario compatible with the practice of non-price competition? Explain your answer in both cases.

My answer would probably be yes in both scenarios because it would cost less to advertise because of the limitations. However I would think that if you had a limit there is no way to really out do the competitor.

Help please. Thanks

  • Economics -

    If advertising costs were limited, the major companies would probably lose some market share to smaller companies that didn't advertise as much.

  • Economics -

    Did you ever find the answer to this. I am working on it for my final now.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Economics

    Pat and Kris are roommates. They spend most of their time studying, but they leave some time for their favorite activities: making pizza and brewing root beer. Pat takes 4 hours to brew a gallon of root beer and 2 hours to make a pizza. …
  2. management

    Yuengling’s beer sales were up 225% in the last six years, but that the company’s old Eagle Brewery facility, which could only produce 500,000 barrels of beer per year, could not keep up with growing demand. After temporarily rerouting …
  3. human resources

    Yuengling’s beer sales were up 225% in the last six years, but that the company’s old Eagle Brewery facility, which could only produce 500,000 barrels of beer per year, could not keep up with growing demand. After temporarily rerouting …
  4. MicroEconomics

    If Budweiser, Miller and Coors, who together produce 80% of all beer consumed in the US, each spend well over $500 million a year on television advertising campaigns, promoting their beer brands. Would these firms welcome congressional …
  5. Economics

    Poland Spring, Dasani and Aquafina who together produce 90% of all the bottled water consumed in the US, each spend well over $300 million a year on television advertising campaigns, promoting their water brands. If one firm is advertising …
  6. Math-Value of Mean

    A brewery has a beer dispensing machine that dispenses beer into the company's 12 ounce bottles. The distribution for the amount of beer dispensed by the machine follows a normal distribution with a standard deviation of 0.13 ounce. …
  7. Micro Econ

    Budweiser, Miller and Coors, who together produce 80% of all beer consumed in the US, each spend well over $500 million a year on television advertising campaigns, promoting their beer brands. Do you think these firms would welcome …
  8. math

    Lehen Vinters imports a certain brand of beer. The demand, which may be assumed to be uniform, is 450,000 cases/year. The cost of ordering a shipment of beer is $500, and the cost of storing each case of beer for a year is $2. Determine …
  9. math

    Lehen Vinters imports a certain brand of beer. The demand, which may be assumed to be uniform, is 450,000 cases/year. The cost of ordering a shipment of beer is $500, and the cost of storing each case of beer for a year is $2. Determine …
  10. math

    Lehen Vinters imports a certain brand of beer. The demand, which may be assumed to be uniform, is 450,000 cases/year. The cost of ordering a shipment of beer is $500, and the cost of storing each case of beer for a year is $2. Determine …

More Similar Questions