Your conclusions are faulty in a cause-and-effect essay if:
A. you include secondary effects
B. you include only short-term effects
C. you distinguish between long-term effects and short-term effects
D. you include primary effects
I believe it's B?
I think you're right.
thank u
You're welcome.
To determine the correct answer, let's break down and analyze each option:
A. Including secondary effects: Including secondary effects is not necessarily faulty in a cause-and-effect essay. Secondary effects are the consequences that occur after the initial cause and can provide valuable insights into the topic.
B. Including only short-term effects: This option is stating that if you include only short-term effects in a cause-and-effect essay, it leads to faulty conclusions. The implication here is that considering only immediate consequences may overlook long-term effects, which can potentially result in an incomplete or inaccurate analysis. Therefore, this option suggests a potential flaw in the essay.
C. Distinguishing between long-term effects and short-term effects: Distinguishing between long-term and short-term effects is considered a good practice in cause-and-effect essays. It allows for a comprehensive understanding of the causal relationship and its impact over different time frames. So, this option does not indicate a faulty conclusion.
D. Including primary effects: Including primary effects, which are the initial consequences of a cause, is crucial in cause-and-effect essays. Primary effects help establish the causal link and provide a foundation for further analysis.
After analyzing each option, we can conclude that the correct answer is option B. Including only short-term effects in a cause-and-effect essay can lead to faulty conclusions as it neglects the potential impact of long-term effects.