Why was the government of Canada(1791)

not truly a representative government?

This system was not truly a representative one because a representative government is one in which representatives are elected by people to make laws on their behalf, and this wasn't done in this government. It never represented all of Canada. It was an oligarchy government. It was limited and the people couldn't vote anyone in those positions of power.

I kind of got stuck on this one...anything else that needs to be added?

Good answer.

You've provided a good explanation so far. However, to further explain why the government of Canada in 1791 was not truly representative, we can delve into some additional details.

Firstly, it is important to note that the government of Canada in 1791 was created through the Constitutional Act of 1791. This act divided the Province of Quebec into two separate colonies, Upper Canada (now Ontario) and Lower Canada (now Quebec). Each colony had its own government, but neither of these governments truly represented the population.

One key factor was that only a small portion of the population was eligible to vote and participate in the political process. Voting rights were restricted to a small group of male property owners and landholders. This meant that the majority of people, including women, Indigenous populations, and individuals who did not own property, were excluded from political representation.

Furthermore, the governors appointed by the British crown had significant powers and control over the legislative process. They had the authority to veto any laws passed by the legislative assemblies, which limited the ability of the elected representatives to govern and make decisions on behalf of the people they were supposed to represent.

Overall, the government of Canada in 1791 was not truly representative because of limited suffrage and the significant influence of appointed governors. The majority of the population did not have the right to vote, and the power of decision-making ultimately rested in the hands of the British-appointed officials rather than the elected representatives.

To enhance and complete your explanation, you could consider including these additional factors.