I got some help to get started but the material still seems like a foreign language. Someone layed out a nice outline for me to follow, but without understanding the material I still can't get anywhere.

It is how to CONDUCT a stakeholder analysis I am stuck on.
The few paragraphs under the heading "stakeholders analysis" doesn't explain much to help me complete the assignment.
Can someone please explain this to me? The text is so not helping at all.

Please, please, please help me!! I got 95% on the appendix B matrix about consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. I also understand the 3 approaches to decision making- the 5-Question, Pastin's and Moral Standards approaches, but do not understand this assignment about the stakeholder impact analysis.

Describe, in 200 to 300 words, how you might conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 of Appendix B using each of the stakeholder impact analysis approaches: moral standards, five-question, and Pastin’s approach.

This is the scenario-
The mayor of a small seaside town faces a tough decision. A prominent developer has submitted a proposal to build a large mall and resort in the town. This development is estimated to bring $150 million in tourism each year and several hundred new jobs to the community, which badly needs the economic boost. The proposed location of the new development, however, is a site that now houses the only nursing home and senior citizens’ recreation center in the area. Both the nursing home and recreation center would have to be demolished, affecting 100 seniors and 30 employees. There is no other location in town where the new development can be built. How should the mayor decide: in favor of economic prosperity or in defense of his elderly citizens?

Student responses must correctly describe how to conduct a stakeholder impact analysis using each of the three approaches described in Ch. 5: moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach.
Responses should address the following key points in the context of the scenario:

Descriptions of the three standards that comprise the moral standards approach: utilitarian, individual rights, and justice

Identification of the questions used in the 5-question approach:
1. Is the decision profitable? 2. Is the decision legal? 3.Is the decision fair? 4. Is the decision right? 5. Does the decision further sustainable development?

Descriptions of the four key aspects of Pastin’s approach:
1. Ground rule ethics 2. End-point ethics 3. Rule ethics 4. Social contract ethics

http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1296831269

Have you googled "How to CONDUCT a stakeholder analysis"?

I just did and there are many good links.

Whether these are helpful, only you would know.

I can't post links here, otherwise I would.

Good luck.

To conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 using the three approaches (moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin's approach), you need to consider the perspectives and impacts on various stakeholders involved in the situation. Here's how you can approach each method:

1. Moral Standards Approach:
This approach involves assessing the decision from three ethical standards: utilitarian, individual rights, and justice.
- Utilitarian: Consider the overall happiness and well-being that the development would bring to the community in terms of economic prosperity and job creation. Also, consider the potential negative impact on the seniors and employees affected by the demolition.
- Individual Rights: Examine the rights of the seniors and employees who will be affected by the decision. Consider their right to a peaceful and accommodating living environment and their right to continue working.
- Justice: Evaluate the fairness of the decision in terms of distributing the benefits and burdens of the development. Consider whether allowing the project to proceed would disproportionately harm the seniors and employees and if alternative solutions could be explored.

2. Five-Question Approach:
This approach involves asking five key questions to assess the decision:
1. Is the decision profitable? Evaluate the economic benefits the development would bring to the community.
2. Is the decision legal? Consider whether the proposed development meets legal requirements and regulations.
3. Is the decision fair? Assess the fairness of the decision by considering the impact on the seniors, employees, and the community as a whole.
4. Is the decision right? Examine the ethical implications and consequences of the decision from a broader moral standpoint.
5. Does the decision further sustainable development? Investigate whether the proposed development aligns with long-term environmental and social sustainability goals.

3. Pastin's Approach:
In Pastin's approach, four key aspects need to be addressed:
1. Ground Rule Ethics: Examine the fundamental values and principles that should guide decision-making in this situation. Consider the impact on integrity, respect, honesty, or any other relevant ethical values.
2. End-Point Ethics: Consider the desired outcome or goal that the decision should achieve. Balance the economic prosperity of the community against the well-being of the seniors and employees.
3. Rule Ethics: Evaluate the existing rules, policies, or norms that apply to this situation. Assess whether any ethical principles or societal expectations are being violated or upheld.
4. Social Contract Ethics: Analyze the expectations and responsibilities between the stakeholders involved in the decision. Consider the contractual agreements, obligations, and mutual benefits.

By considering each approach separately, you can analyze the stakeholder impacts of the scenario comprehensively, addressing moral standards, essential questions, and different aspects of ethical considerations.