How did Hindus and Buddhists look at social class differently? Hindus looked at social class as the type of group you're in and the duties you have. But, Buddhists looked at social class as something that didn't determine a person's place in life. Is this what my teacher is looking for???
Yes, I think so.
Buddhists concentrated on living the right kind of life with wisdom and a relative absence of ambition or earthly goals.
THANK YOU SO MUCH
This helped me a lot thank you so much!
Thus really helped me a lot thanks for the support.
Based on your understanding, it seems that you have summarized the difference in how Hindus and Buddhists looked at social class. Hindus perceived social class, or varna, as a hierarchical system determined by birth and duties. This system, known as the caste system, divided people into predetermined groups with specific responsibilities and privileges.
On the other hand, Buddhists viewed social class as an arbitrary distinction that did not determine a person's worth or place in life. Buddhism advocated for the idea that all individuals possess the potential for enlightenment, regardless of their social background. Buddhists emphasized the importance of one's actions, known as karma, in determining their spiritual progress, rather than their social position.
Now, to determine if your summary aligns with what your teacher is expecting, it would be best to consult with your teacher directly. Each instructor may have individual expectations and preferences. Asking for clarification will help ensure that you provide the answer your teacher is looking for.