Apart from the composition of the rock itself, what climate do you imagine is more conducive to physical weathering? and Chemical weathering?
I know physical weathering is from wind and water transporting the eroded rocks and particles. Chemical weathering is water transporting disolved elements.
So would the chemical answer be a wet climate and for physical a windy climate?
i dont know
ryan you seem done with school like the rest of us
@arson he’s not the only one
Yes, you are on the right track! The climate can indeed play a significant role in both physical and chemical weathering processes.
In terms of physical weathering, a windy climate can be more conducive. Wind can cause abrasion on rocks by carrying small particles, such as sand or dust, which can act as natural sandblasting agents. These particles can impact and erode the surface of rocks over time, leading to physical weathering.
For chemical weathering, a wet climate is generally more conducive. Water can dissolve minerals present in rocks, leading to chemical reactions and the breakdown of rock materials. In a wet climate, water availability is higher, increasing the likelihood of chemical interactions between water and rock minerals. Precipitation can also carry dissolved elements, contributing to the chemical weathering process.
However, it is important to note that both physical and chemical weathering can occur in various climates. Other factors, such as temperature, vegetation cover, and the type of rocks involved, can also influence the extent and rate of weathering. So while a windy and wet climate may generally support physical and chemical weathering, respectively, it is just one piece of the puzzle.
To determine the extent of weathering in a specific area, it is often necessary to consider multiple factors and conduct detailed studies, including analyzing the composition of rocks and studying the local climate conditions.