the french and idian war was a deadly war but important. is this a good thesis statement?

In what way was it important?

it helpd change things in history

Hi majenta,

In my view a thesis statement is only good if it is properly justified. In this case, you have to clarify what you mean by "important" - which may be subjective (different people may interpret it differently) as well as rather broad.

So like what I think PsyDAG said, you're gonna have to incorporate things like (why and) in what way you felt the war was important into the thesis statement itself.

Also, saying that it helped change things in history is a little vague for me, so I would be specific as to what changes in history the war led to and then show how the changes were actually important in my body paragraphs if I were writing an essay. Of course, if you're just writing a short paragraph, then such specific justification may not be required.

These are only my views though, I hope I helped! (:

-J

thanks

To evaluate whether "The French and Indian War was a deadly war but important" is a good thesis statement, let's break it down and analyze its components.

1. Subject: "The French and Indian War"
- This part specifies the topic of the thesis statement, which is the French and Indian War. It provides focus and sets the context for the argument.

2. Assertion 1: "was a deadly war"
- This component claims that the war was deadly. However, it lacks specificity and doesn't explain what made it deadly. To strengthen this point, it would be helpful to include examples or evidence supporting the claim of its deadliness.

3. Assertion 2: "but important"
- The term "important" is quite broad and subjective. To be a strong argument, it is necessary to clarify why the war was important. What were the implications, consequences, or long-term effects that make it significant?

Overall, while the thesis statement you provided introduces the topic of the French and Indian War, it lacks specificity and needs further development. To strengthen it, consider revising and providing specific reasons or evidence for why the war was both deadly and important.