I have trouble with labeling these statements if someone can help I would appreciate it. I need to know if the labeling is correct if not what is the correct labeling.
I believe these are ambiguous or vague statements-1. federal reserve looking to spend upwards of 1 trillion or more.
2. remember again this is fiat money, meaning it is money printed out of thin air
3. no matter how bad it gets on main street, the banksters on wall street will still have it.
I belive these are fallacies-1. president bush and congress will make sure of that. this is one thing republicans and democrats can agree on. I believe this is slippery slope.
2. Americas founders were rightfully skeptical of granting to much power to bankers. i believe this is hasty generalization and i also believe this statement is also, jefferson believed that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.
3. I believe this is poisoning the well- bush, obama, and mccain had any honesty and integrity they would approach current banking malady in the same way that president jackson did.
I believe these are rhetoric devices-1. I believe this is a euphenism, our first and greatest president george washington said.
2. I believe this is a rhetoric analogy, the glue that holds this crumbling scheme together is a fiat currency known as the federal reserve.
3. I believe this is a rhetoric definition, which was created out of thin air by an international banking cartel called the federal reserve. Please help so i can see if these are correct.
Sure, I'd be happy to help you label these statements. Here's how you can approach it:
1. Ambiguous/Vague Statements:
- "Federal reserve looking to spend upwards of 1 trillion or more." – This statement can be considered ambiguous because it does not provide specific details about what the Federal Reserve intends to spend the money on or the context.
- "Remember again this is fiat money, meaning it is money printed out of thin air." – This statement is not ambiguous or vague as it provides a clear definition and explanation of what fiat money is.
2. Fallacies:
- "President Bush and Congress will make sure of that. This is one thing Republicans and Democrats can agree on." – This statement involves an appeal to authority fallacy by suggesting that President Bush and Congress will ensure a particular outcome just because they are Republicans and Democrats.
- "America's founders were rightfully skeptical of granting too much power to bankers." – This statement does not seem to contain any fallacies.
- "Jefferson believed that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." – This statement is not a fallacy; it is an appeal to authority by referencing Jefferson's opinion.
3. Rhetorical Devices:
- "If Bush, Obama, and McCain had any honesty and integrity, they would approach the current banking malady in the same way that President Jackson did." – This statement seems more like a general argument rather than a clear use of a specific rhetorical device.
- "Our first and greatest president George Washington said..." – This statement does not seem to contain any specific rhetorical device; it could be considered a form of an appeal to authority.
- "The glue that holds this crumbling scheme together is a fiat currency known as the federal reserve." – This statement contains a metaphorical analogy comparing the role of fiat currency to glue.
- "Which was created out of thin air by an international banking cartel called the Federal Reserve." – This statement does not seem to contain any specific rhetorical device; it could be considered a tactic of framing or simplification.
Please note that the labeling I provided is based on the information you provided, but different perspectives may identify different labels or fallacies.