Here is the brief outline that I created.
Outline:
Intro: make my position (Pro side of the topic)
1st point: I think richer countries should take care of poorer countries because they have the resources and the ability to do so and they should use it to help developing countries.
Supporting arguments: 1. it is almost a sort of indirect duty of the richer countries because God has provided them with the wealth to do such things. (?)
2.
3.
2nd point: when richer countries help the poorer countries, whether physically or financially, it will create more peace between the countries and there will be a lesser chance of conflicts occurring within those countries.
Supporting arguments: 1. If we help developing nations develop their own economies, they will eventually become customers for our products.
2. example of the Marshall Plan after WWII. It strengthened Europe and helped prevent further wars there.
3. Universal Decleration of Human Rights (UDHR)-plan to avoid deadly wars (like WWII) and assist poor countries in raising their standard of living.
3rd point: There is also a moral imperative to help those that are less fortunate.
Supporting arguments: 1. Helping the poor is a strong component of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism.
2.
3.
Conclusion: Sum up all the points. End with my thesis statement (?)
Can you please 1. correct the points, if any, that I've mistaken or put in the wrong place, 2. give me ideas on how to fill in the blank spaces.
Thank you
In the body of your paper, avoid using "I" or "me." Also -- make your statements without prefacing them with "I think."
For the first point, you could compare statistics about per capita income, education, and mortality rate in the wealthy countries vs. the poorest countries.
For the third part, I'd start with the Golden Rule which is universal in all cultures. Then, cite specific Bible and Qu'ran verses on the obligations to help the poor.
Outline:
Intro: make my position (Pro side of the topic)
1st point: I think richer countries should take care of poorer countries because they have the resources and the ability to do so and they should use it to help developing countries.
Supporting arguments: 1. it is almost a sort of indirect duty of the richer countries because God has provided them with the wealth to do such things. (?)
2. Compare statistics about per capita income, education, and mortality rate in the wealthy countries vs. the poorest countries.
3.
2nd point: when richer countries help the poorer countries, whether physically or financially, it will create more peace between the countries and there will be a lesser chance of conflicts occurring within those countries.
Supporting arguments: 1. If we help developing nations develop their own economies, they will eventually become customers for our products.
2. example of the Marshall Plan after WWII. It strengthened Europe and helped prevent further wars there.
3. Universal Decleration of Human Rights (UDHR)-plan to avoid deadly wars (like WWII) and assist poor countries in raising their standard of living.
3rd point: There is also a moral imperative to help those that are less fortunate.
Supporting arguments: 1. Helping the poor is a strong component of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism.
2. start with the Golden Rule which is universal in all cultures.
3. cite specific Bible and Qu'ran verses on the obligations to help the poor.
Conclusion: Sum up all the points. End with my thesis statement (?)
Okay, I made the necessary changes. I do have an appointment with the writing tutors at my college on Wednesday but I don't wanna show up empty. So I was thinking that I should start writing just a basic 5 paragraph essay and then they can help me work on it and expand it so it fulfills the 4 page requirement. Does that sound ok?
That's an excellent idea. The writing tutors know better than I do what is expected at your college.
Certainly! Based on your outline, here are some suggestions for filling in the blank spaces and refining your points:
1st point:
Supporting argument 1: Richer countries should take care of poorer countries not only because they have the resources, but also because it is a moral and ethical responsibility. Instead of viewing it as an indirect duty from God, you can consider the principle of global solidarity and human interconnectedness. The idea is that those who have more should help those who have less, in order to promote fairness and create a more just world.
Supporting argument 2: Richer countries have a vested interest in helping poorer countries because it can have positive economic implications. Through development aid and investment, richer countries can help stimulate the economies of developing nations, which can in turn create new markets and opportunities for economic cooperation. This can benefit the richer countries by expanding their customer base and promoting global economic stability.
Supporting argument 3: By supporting developing countries, richer countries can also address root causes of conflicts such as poverty, inequality, and lack of resources. By providing assistance in areas like education, healthcare, and infrastructure development, richer countries can contribute to the stability and peace of the world. You can further elaborate on this point by providing specific examples of conflicts that have been prevented or resolved through such assistance.
2nd point:
Supporting argument 1: Helping developing nations develop their own economies creates a win-win situation. By supporting economic growth and development in poorer countries, it can lead to increased trade and investment opportunities for both parties. This can not only benefit the economies of the richer countries, but also promote long-term sustainable development in the poorer countries, reducing their reliance on aid and creating self-sufficiency.
Supporting argument 2: The Marshall Plan after World War II is a great example to support your point. You can explain how it provided financial and technical assistance to war-torn European countries, helping to rebuild their infrastructure and economies. This not only helped prevent further conflicts in Europe but also led to the establishment of strong economic partnerships and alliances that still exist today.
Supporting argument 3: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) emphasizes the importance of human dignity, equality, and the right to a decent standard of living. By providing assistance to poorer countries, richer nations can contribute to fulfilling these fundamental rights and principles outlined in the UDHR. Highlight specific articles from the UDHR that emphasize the importance of international cooperation and support for developing nations.
3rd point:
Supporting argument 1: Helping the less fortunate aligns with the core values of major religions such as Islam, Christianity, and Judaism. Each of these religions emphasizes the importance of compassion, charity, and helping those in need. By referencing specific teachings or scriptures from these religions, you can strengthen your argument and show the widespread acknowledgment of the moral imperative to assist the less fortunate.
Supporting argument 2: Another aspect to consider is the long-term benefits of assisting poorer countries. By investing in their education, healthcare systems, and infrastructure, richer nations can contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty and creating more opportunities for future generations. This can lead to a more stable and prosperous world, benefiting all nations in the long run.
Conclusion:
In your conclusion, you can summarize the main points you've discussed in your outline and restate your thesis statement. You can also emphasize the importance of global cooperation, solidarity, and the need for richer countries to take on their responsibility to support and strengthen poorer nations.