Is this statement social, political, or economic?

"The old former masters to do not allow us anything for our labor..."

Thanks
-MC

...to do...?

I suspect the person is saying they did not get paid for working...as on Jiskha.

We do it for love.

So it's economic?

-MC

I would go with economic. However, many folks would see the strong social overtones first. I would go with economic. Slavery is first an economic system, as is indentured servitude, but a lot of folks would argue social system first.

Go with economic, and prepare yourself to argue.

I agree with Bob. The statement is primarily economic. Of course there's a strong correlation between all three, but the economic aspect is emphasized in that statement.

Thanks to both of you(:

-MC

To determine whether this statement is social, political, or economic, we need to analyze the context and subject matter of the statement.

In this statement, the focus is on labor and the lack of remuneration for it. Therefore, it falls more within the economic domain, as it relates to the issues of wages, compensation, and the distribution of resources based on work.

To reach this conclusion, I used my understanding of the terms "social," "political," and "economic" and their respective spheres of influence. The economic sphere deals with matters related to production, consumption, and the distribution of resources. The social sphere involves interactions between individuals, groups, and society, while the political sphere revolves around matters related to governance, power, and decision-making.

By analyzing the content of the statement and identifying the central theme of labor and remuneration, we can determine that it primarily falls within the economic domain.