In terms of materials, techniques, innovations, purposes, and ideas, discuss the difference in Greek and Roman architecture? I also need specific examples to support these points?

I have -Greek architectural order, Doric, Ionic and Corinthian
Parthenon-columns tilted slightly and swell making them appear concave, Parthenon more visible to Athenean citizens, used to house statue and as a backdrop for religious rituals

I need more points I could use to formulate it into an essay-Thank You

These sites have a lot of good information.

http://www.1902encyclopedia.com/A/ARC/architecture-065.html

http://www.ehow.com/how_5526113_compare-contrast-greek-roman-architecture.html

(Broken Link Removed)

thank you

When comparing Greek and Roman architecture, there are several key differences that can be explored in terms of materials, techniques, innovations, purposes, and ideas. Here are some additional points you could include to formulate your essay:

Materials:
1. Greek Architecture: The Greeks primarily used local materials such as limestone, marble, and clay for construction.
2. Roman Architecture: The Romans utilized a wider range of materials including concrete, brick, and volcanic rock such as tuff and travertine.

Techniques:
1. Greek Architecture: Greek buildings often showcased an emphasis on symmetry, proportion, and mathematical precision. The use of post-and-lintel construction, where horizontal beams (lintels) are supported by vertical columns, was prevalent.
2. Roman Architecture: Romans developed the technique of using arches, domes, and vaults made possible by their mastery of concrete. This allowed for larger, more expansive structures such as the Colosseum and the Pantheon.

Innovations:
1. Greek Architecture: The Greeks introduced three architectural orders: Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. Each order had specific proportions and decorative elements that characterized their respective columns.
2. Roman Architecture: While the Romans adopted the Greek orders, they also introduced the Composite order, a combination of Ionic and Corinthian elements. This innovation demonstrated their willingness to experiment and assimilate ideas from different cultures.

Purposes:
1. Greek Architecture: Greek temples served as religious sanctuaries, with the Parthenon in Athens being a prime example. These temples were designed to house statues of gods and goddesses and serve as the backdrop for religious rituals.
2. Roman Architecture: Roman architecture encompassed a wider variety of structures, ranging from temples and basilicas to amphitheaters and aqueducts. They also prioritized practicality and functionality, emphasizing the use of public spaces for the benefit of their growing empire.

Ideas:
1. Greek Architecture: Greek architecture reflected their belief in the harmony between humans and the divine. The design and layout of Greek cities, such as the city of Priene, showcased a grid-like plan that reflected their pursuit of order and balance.
2. Roman Architecture: Roman architecture emphasized grandeur, power, and the display of authority. The impressive structures like the Arch of Constantine and the Colosseum were designed to convey the might of the Roman Empire and the glory of its rulers.

By incorporating these additional points into your essay, you will be able to provide a comprehensive analysis of the differences between Greek and Roman architecture. Remember to support each point with specific examples, such as the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus or the Baths of Caracalla, to provide a solid foundation for your arguments.