Dr. Bob's computerized records are damaged by a power surge. Which of the following is most true?

A. Dr bob isn't at fault. B. Dr Bob is at fault. C. The records custodian, but not Dr bob will be liable. D. Dr Bob is at fault unless he had proper surge protection devices in place.

I say Dr. Bob is at fault but I am not confident in my answer.

And the other one I am having trouble with is: Dr Bob's computerized records have been compromised by a hacker, resulting in damages to patients. Which of the following is most true?

A. Dr Bob may be liable if he didn't have proper firewall or other protections
B. Dr Bob won't be liable
C. Dr Bob will be liable
D. The risk manager, but not dr bob, will be liable.

I again say Dr bob is liable but am confused because in my book it makes this notation: The health information manager lessens the possibility of legal liability for unauthorized access to or careless handling of patient info. So it makes me think that answer D may be the correct answer.

Can you please help me on these 2 questions.

Of course! I'd be happy to help you with these questions and provide some guidance on how to approach them.

For the first question about Dr. Bob's computerized records being damaged by a power surge, we need to consider who might be at fault or liable. Let's break down the options:

A. Dr. Bob isn't at fault: This option suggests that Dr. Bob is not responsible for the damage caused by the power surge. We can't definitively say this is the most true answer without further information.

B. Dr. Bob is at fault: This option suggests that Dr. Bob is solely responsible for the damage. Again, without more information, we can't be confident in this answer.

C. The records custodian, but not Dr. Bob, will be liable: This option implies that the custodian responsible for the records is the one at fault, not Dr. Bob. It's a possibility, but we can't say for sure without more context.

D. Dr. Bob is at fault unless he had proper surge protection devices in place: This option suggests that Dr. Bob is at fault unless he took proper measures, such as having surge protection devices, to prevent the damage. It seems like a plausible answer, especially if Dr. Bob had control over protecting his computerized records.

To determine the most true answer, we would ideally need more information. However, given the limited options, and considering that Dr. Bob is responsible for maintaining his computerized records, option D appears to be the most reasonable choice. It acknowledges that Dr. Bob may be at fault unless he had proper protection in place. Keep in mind that legal matters can vary depending on jurisdiction and specific circumstances.

Moving on to the second question about Dr. Bob's compromised computerized records, let's assess the options:

A. Dr. Bob may be liable if he didn't have proper firewall or other protections: This option suggests that Dr. Bob could be held accountable if he failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures to protect the records. It seems reasonable, as individuals are generally expected to take appropriate measures to safeguard sensitive data.

B. Dr. Bob won't be liable: This option asserts that Dr. Bob bears no responsibility for the damages resulting from the hacking incident. Again, without more context, we can't confidently say this is the most true answer.

C. Dr. Bob will be liable: This option states that Dr. Bob is solely accountable for the damages caused by the hacker. We can't definitively support this answer without further information.

D. The risk manager, but not Dr. Bob, will be liable: This option suggests that the risk manager, rather than Dr. Bob, would be held responsible for the damages. Given the information you provided, it seems unlikely that the risk manager would be solely liable.

Considering the information in your book, which mentions the health information manager's role in lessening legal liability for unauthorized access, option A appears to be the most accurate answer. Dr. Bob may be held liable if he did not have proper firewall or other protections in place. It is worth noting, however, that the specific legal implications can depend on various factors, including local regulations and any contractual agreements in place.

Remember that these answers are based on the information provided, and the best course of action is to consult appropriate legal or professional resources for specific advice in a given situation.

For the first question, regarding Dr. Bob's computerized records being damaged by a power surge, the most accurate answer would be:

D. Dr. Bob is at fault unless he had proper surge protection devices in place.

Without proper surge protection devices in place, Dr. Bob is responsible for ensuring the safety and security of his computerized records. However, if he did have the necessary surge protection devices, then he may not be held at fault for the power surge damaging his records.

Regarding the second question, about Dr. Bob's computerized records being compromised by a hacker resulting in damages to patients, the most accurate answer is:

A. Dr. Bob may be liable if he didn't have proper firewall or other protections.

Dr. Bob may be held liable if it is determined that he did not have the necessary cybersecurity measures in place, such as a firewall or other appropriate protections. However, it is important to note that the risk manager may also bear some responsibility for ensuring the security of patient information.

It is crucial to consult relevant legal statutes, regulations, and guidelines to determine the specific liabilities and responsibilities in such situations, as they can vary based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances.