The United Nation declared that the world's six-billionth inhabitant was born on October 12, 1999 in Bosnia. Don't discuss what is not said. Discuss what is said. what is wrong with this statement according to what is allowed in statistics?
According to the statement, the United Nations declared that the world's six-billionth inhabitant was born on October 12, 1999 in Bosnia. The key phrase here is "what is not said," which implies that we need to focus on the information that is provided and consider what might be missing from the statement.
From a statistical perspective, there are a few issues with the statement:
1. Lack of verification: The statement claims that the United Nations declared the birth of the six-billionth inhabitant, but it does not provide any specific details or evidence to support this claim. Without verification or a reliable source, it is difficult to assess the accuracy of the assertion.
2. Unclear methodology: The statement does not mention how the United Nations determined that this particular birth represented the world's six-billionth inhabitant. Statistical claims typically need to be supported by a clear and transparent methodology to ensure objectivity.
3. Sampling bias: The statement specifies that the world's six-billionth inhabitant was born in Bosnia on October 12, 1999. This suggests that the United Nations made a specific determination based on a single birth event in a particular location. However, sampling a single birth in Bosnia may not accurately represent the entire world population or the precise moment when the world's population reached six billion.
In conclusion, the statement lacks verification, fails to provide a clear methodology, and may suffer from sampling bias. Consequently, it is necessary to exercise caution when accepting the claim made in the statement and consider additional information and evidence before drawing any definitive conclusions.