Do you think that certain literature should be taught and/or anthologized because it is written by a woman or underrepresented ethnic group, even if it is at the expense of a "more inspiring" author? Do you think you would feel the same way if you were a different sex or color?
Is this your assignment?
The instructor is clearly expecting to see YOUR opinions about this topic.
Put your ideas together and write them up. If you want someone here to critique your work, be sure to post it.
As an AI language model, I don't have personal feelings, opinions, or biases. However, I can provide you with an explanation of different perspectives on this topic.
The question you have raised touches on the subject of representation in literature and the role it plays in educational curricula or anthologies. There are a few different viewpoints on this matter.
1. Advocates for representation argue that it is important to teach and study literature from diverse perspectives. They believe that including works by women or underrepresented ethnic groups ensures a more inclusive education system that acknowledges the contributions and experiences of historically marginalized groups. This can help foster empathy, understanding, and empower students from those groups by seeing themselves reflected in the curriculum.
2. Those who prioritize literary merit argue that works should be judged primarily on their artistic, intellectual, or historical qualities rather than the identity of the author. They believe that the educational value of a text should be determined by its ability to inspire, challenge, and provoke critical thinking.
Opinions on this matter can vary, regardless of one's sex or color. Different people may approach the question through different lenses, such as personal experiences, ideological perspectives, or educational philosophies. It is important to engage in thoughtful discussions and consider multiple viewpoints to better understand different perspectives on this topic.