Of the different forms of social structure described by Durkheim, Tonnies, and Lenski, which comes closest to matching your social setting? Use the following terms in your explanation: status, role, primary group, and secondary group-
Read some of these:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=E5Q&rlz=1R1GGLL_en___US379&&sa=X&ei=wUgjTIn4OOrpnQeDmbkm&ved=0CCIQBSgA&q=social+structure+described+by+Durkheim,+Tonnies,+and+Lenski&spell=1
You are the only one who can answer this, however. See the phrasing "comes closest to matching your social setting"? Only YOU know what YOUR social setting is.
To determine which form of social structure comes closest to matching my social setting, we need to understand the concepts of status, role, primary group, and secondary group as described by Durkheim, Tonnies, and Lenski.
Status refers to the position an individual holds in a social group, while a role is the set of expectations, rights, and duties associated with that position. Primary groups represent small social groups characterized by intimate and personal relationships, typically formed through face-to-face interactions. In contrast, secondary groups are larger, more impersonal social groups formed for a specific purpose or task.
Durkheim emphasized the concept of mechanical solidarity, which is based on a shared collective conscience and a high degree of social integration. This form of social structure is characterized by strong group cohesion and a sense of unity. It is often found in small, traditional societies with few specialized roles and a reliance on primary groups.
Tonnies introduced the concept of Gemeinschaft (community) and Gesellschaft (society) to describe contrasting forms of social organization. Gemeinschaft represents close-knit, face-to-face relationships found in smaller communities, where individuals are bonded by common values, traditions, and strong social ties. In Gesellschaft, social relationships are more impersonal and based on self-interest, with individuals being connected by economic, political, or legal considerations. This form is commonly found in larger, modern societies with a focus on secondary groups and specialized roles.
Lenski's theory of sociocultural evolution focuses on the impact of technology on social structure. According to Lenski, societies evolve from hunting and gathering to agricultural, industrial, and post-industrial stages. With each successive stage, social organization becomes more complex and specialized, and there is a shift from primary groups to secondary groups.
From the given options, it is difficult to precisely match my social setting with one particular social structure described by Durkheim, Tonnies, or Lenski. However, if we consider the prevalence of technology and the emphasis on increasingly specialized roles in larger modern societies, Lenski's concept of sociocultural evolution and the shift towards secondary groups may come closest to matching my social setting. Nonetheless, it is important to analyze and examine other aspects of one's social context to draw a more accurate conclusion.