In "A Nation Apart" what is the thesis statement in the article? what strategies does the author use to formulate his argument? and what makes the argument viable and compelling?
Many others have asked this same question. Read through the responses they received.
http://www.jiskha.com/search/index.cgi?query=A+Nation+Apart
what is the thesis statement for A Nation Torn Apart
To determine the thesis statement in the article "A Nation Apart," identify the central idea or main claim that the author is trying to present. To do this, closely examine the introduction and conclusion of the article, as these sections typically contain the thesis statement or a clear indication of it.
1. Start by reading the introduction: Look for a sentence or paragraph that succinctly summarizes the main argument or position the author is taking. This will likely be the thesis statement.
2. Analyze the conclusion: Ensure that the thesis statement is supported or restated in the conclusion, emphasizing its significance and summarizing the author's main points.
Once you have identified the thesis statement, look for the strategies that the author uses to formulate their argument. These might include:
1. Claims supported by evidence: Determine if the author presents specific evidence, such as facts, statistics, or examples, to support their main argument. Analyze whether this evidence is credible and relevant.
2. Logical reasoning: Examine whether the author uses logical reasoning to connect their evidence to their main argument. This could include cause-effect relationships or deductive reasoning.
3. Counterarguments and refutations: Look for instances where the author addresses opposing viewpoints and offers counterarguments to strengthen their position.
4. Persuasive language: Pay attention to the author's use of persuasive techniques, such as emotional appeals or rhetorical devices, to engage the reader and make their argument more compelling.
To evaluate the viability and compelling nature of the argument, consider the following factors:
1. Strong evidence: Assess if the evidence provided by the author is substantial, credible, and persuasive. Evaluate whether it effectively supports their main argument.
2. Coherence and logic: Determine if the author's reasoning is logical and coherent, presenting a strong and structured argument that is easy to follow.
3. Relevance: Consider whether the argument is relevant to the context and whether it addresses the underlying issue effectively.
4. Engagement with opposing viewpoints: Evaluate how well the author engages with opposing viewpoints, offers counterarguments, and refutes them, which demonstrates the author's ability to anticipate and address potential objections.
By closely analyzing the article's introduction and conclusion, as well as considering the author's strategies and the viability and compelling nature of the argument, you can successfully answer the question.