How have the historical laws of the code of Hammarubi, Draco's Law, Law of the Twelve Tables, Justinian Code, Magna Carta, and the Statue of Westminster led to the development of security forces, both private and public? Why do you think the need for both private and public security still exists?
How would you like us to help you with this complex assignment?
The laws in past that governed the “old country” established the foundations that our country sets forth today. The laws set a precedence of all people are created equal, and the law of the book binds each. Every person who commits an illegal act is bound for punishment under the law of the book. These law placed on the books allows all to live in peace. The security (both private and public) have been established and remains in force for the protection of all citizens, and immigrants.
As long as there are laws there will be people who break them.
The historical laws you mentioned have indeed played a significant role in the development of security forces, both private and public. Let's explore each law and its influence on security forces.
1. Code of Hammurabi: Created around 1754 BC in ancient Babylon, it aimed to establish a system of justice. This law recognized the need for security by codifying rules related to theft, property damage, and personal injury. It established a basis for ensuring public security.
2. Draco's Law: Originating in ancient Greece around 621 BC, Draco's Law was known for its harsh punishments. Its contribution to security forces lies in the fact that it emphasized the state's responsibility to maintain order and punish criminals. This notion of state authority set the stage for the development of public security forces.
3. Law of the Twelve Tables: Enacted around 450 BC in ancient Rome, this law provided written rules for Roman citizens. It included provisions regarding public safety, such as penalties for property offenses and rules for carrying weapons. By establishing legal guidelines, it indirectly supported the development of security and law enforcement.
4. Justinian Code: Developed in the 6th century AD, this Roman legal code collected and revised existing laws. By providing a comprehensive legal framework, it contributed to the stabilization of society and the strengthening of public security forces.
5. Magna Carta: Signed in 1215 AD in England, the Magna Carta limited the authority of the monarchy and vested power in the nobility. While it didn't directly address security forces, the principles it laid out, such as due process and protection against arbitrary punishment, eventually influenced the development of legal systems and law enforcement agencies.
6. Statute of Westminster: Enacted in 1931 in the United Kingdom, it granted autonomy to the British Dominions. Although not directly tied to security forces, it enhanced the concept of self-governance and the responsibility of individual nations to maintain their security.
Why do we still need both private and public security today? The need arises primarily due to the different roles and responsibilities of each sector.
Public security forces, such as police and military, are responsible for maintaining law and order, safeguarding public safety, and enforcing national security. They have the authority to exercise state power and possess resources for protecting communities as a whole.
On the other hand, private security plays a complementary role to public security. Private security firms are hired by individuals or organizations to protect specific assets, locations, or individuals. They provide services like security guards, surveillance, and risk analysis. Private security caters to the specific needs of clients and sectors that may require additional protection beyond what public security provides.
The existence of both private and public security remains crucial because public security forces alone might not have the capacity to address every security concern. Private security fills the gaps by providing tailored protection and augmenting the efforts of public security. Additionally, private security can operate on a smaller scale and respond to specialized or localized security needs more efficiently.
In conclusion, the historical laws you mentioned have contributed to the development of security forces, enabling the establishment of public security systems and promoting the need for private security to complement public efforts. The coexistence of private and public security is necessary to ensure comprehensive protection and address diverse security requirements in modern societies.