Does anyone know where I can find information on camparing the use of Malathion to the risk of contracting the West Nile Virus? I have to explain my vote and consider any relevant political, social and economical aspects.

Just having trouble finding information, and following this chart that is supposed to help out.

This is NOT science. Science does not involve voting, nor explain voting.

The question involves a fallacy in thinking. Why don't you compare pregnancy with the death penalty? or compare girls to diswashers?

Malathion has many uses, mosquito control is just one of them, and in fact, a minor use of malathion. West Nile virus is one of many diseases carried by mosquitoes, here in Texas we worry about other encephalitis like virus carried by mosquitoes (and ticks).

Now to the fallacy of your question: Why the west Nile virius vs. Malathion? It is not a science issue, it is a political issue. It is exactly the same issue on "natural foods", "organic foods", pesticides in general. Some folks do not want to be around pesticides, regardless if they are toxic or not. If the evidence is clear on toxicity, as it is on Malathon, then those folks will argue things that can never be proved: genetic changes will show up if future generations, or unknown diseases will develope, or whatever. This is not science.

I will give you some links to read. The best defense against fallacies is just getting smart.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malathion
(Broken Link Removed)
http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/PDEP/target_pest_disease_profiles/mediterranean_ff_profile.html

Finding information on the comparison of the use of Malathion to the risk of contracting West Nile Virus can be a complex task. However, I can guide you through the process of finding relevant information and considering the political, social, and economic aspects.

1. Begin by conducting a comprehensive search on academic databases and search engines. Start with general search terms such as "Malathion use and West Nile Virus risk comparison" or "impacts of Malathion on West Nile Virus transmission." These searches will likely yield research articles, academic papers, and scholarly publications related to the topic.

2. To narrow down your search and find information that considers political, social, and economic aspects, refine your search terms. For example, you can search for "political implications of Malathion use for West Nile Virus control" or "economic costs and benefits of Malathion application for West Nile Virus prevention."

3. Pay attention to the credibility of the sources you find. Look for articles published in reputable scientific journals, reports from reputable governmental and non-governmental organizations, and expert opinions from academics or professionals in relevant fields.

4. Use the chart you mentioned as a guide to organize your findings. Identify key factors to consider, such as the effectiveness of Malathion in reducing West Nile Virus transmission, potential health risks associated with Malathion use, impacts on the environment, social acceptance or opposition to the use of pesticides, and the economic costs of prevention and treatment of West Nile Virus.

5. Analyze the information you gather and critically assess the evidence and arguments presented in the sources. Consider both the benefits and potential drawbacks of Malathion use in comparison to the risk of contracting West Nile Virus. Consider how the information aligns with your personal values and beliefs.

6. Finally, when explaining your vote, clearly outline the reasons and evidence behind your decision. Present a well-rounded argument that takes into account scientific evidence, political implications, social considerations, and economic analysis. Ensure you provide references to the sources you used to support your arguments.

Remember, this process requires time and effort. It may involve reading multiple articles, analyzing data, and synthesizing information from various sources.