Statistics

posted by .

Define a relation R on N such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between R and N.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Algebra

    Does this relation define a function? {(-8,2), (-8,8), (-1,8), (5,6), (8,7)} my answer is: No. (-8,2) and (-8,*) the first coordinates are copies of one another.
  2. Algebra

    Does this relation define a function? {(-8,2), (-8,8), (-1,8), (5,6), (8,7)} my answer is: No. (-8,2) and (-8,*) the first coordinates are copies of one another.
  3. Math

    Define a relation R from Z to Z by (x,y) are in the relation if and only if the absolute value of (x-y) is less than or equal to two. Is R symmetric?
  4. math

    Determine whether there is a one-to-one correspondence between the two sets. {Mon, Tue, Wed} and {Oct, Nov, Dec}
  5. MTH 213-Elementary Math

    (a) Illustrate a one-to-one correspondence between the following sets: N = {1, 2, 3, 4,. . . , n,. . .} F = {4, 9, 14, 19, 24,. . .} (b) In your correspondence, what element of F corresponds to 57?
  6. Statistics

    Let N= {1,2,3,...}, that is, N is the set of natural numbers. Find a proper subset X of N such that there is not a one-to-one correspondence between X and N. Find a proper subset Y of N such that there is a one-to-one correspondence …
  7. Math

    Define a relation R on N such that there is a one-to-one correspondence between R and N.
  8. Math

    Let N= {1,2,3,...}, that is, N is the set of natural numbers. Find a proper subset X of N such that there is not a one-to-one correspondence between X and N. Find a proper subset Y of N such that there is a one-to-one correspondence …
  9. Math

    Let N= {1,2,3,...}, that is, N is the set of natural numbers. Find a proper subset X of N such that there is not a one-to-one correspondence between X and N. Find a proper subset Y of N such that there is a one-to-one correspondence …
  10. math

    Define A relation S for subset of R by S=[{A,B:ACR,B is improper Subset to R,[A/B]u[B/A]is finite prove that s is an equivalent relation and the family of finite subset of R one equivalent class

More Similar Questions