If Romeo were Paris and not a Montague, would Juliet still love him? Why or why not? How big a part does "forbidden love" play in their attraction?
To answer this hypothetical question, let's consider the context of Romeo and Juliet's relationship. In Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet fall in love despite being from feuding families, the Montagues and the Capulets. Their love is considered forbidden due to the ongoing rivalry, which adds to the intensity of their relationship.
If Romeo were not a Montague, but instead Paris, a suitable bachelor approved by Juliet's family, the dynamics of their relationship would change significantly. Juliet's parents would likely support the union, and societal expectations would be in their favor.
However, love is a complex emotion influenced by various factors. Although the forbidden nature of their love plays a significant role in Romeo and Juliet's attraction, it is not the sole reason for their feelings. Shakespeare's play emphasizes their instant and intense passion, their connection on a personal level, and the all-consuming nature of their love.
Despite the absence of the forbidden element, it is plausible that Juliet could still love Romeo if he were Paris, as long as their connection and compatibility remain strong. However, without the obstacle of family rivalry, the tension and sense of urgency in their relationship might be diminished. The absence of the forbidden love aspect would likely result in a different dynamic between Romeo and Juliet, potentially altering the trajectory and outcomes of their story.
Therefore, it is essential to remember that while the forbidden love plays a significant part in their attraction, it is accompanied by other factors that contribute to the depth of Romeo and Juliet's love for each other.
This is an opinion question. Your teacher wants to know what YOU THINK.
Please write up what YOU THINK and then repost.