please an agumentative essay about military regimeis better than civilian regime
Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/
Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.
Here are some websites to help you learn how to write an argument:
http://www.powa.org/
Click on Argumentative and go through the different sections carefully.
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/argument.htm
Title: The Case for Military Regimes: Stability and Efficiency
Introduction:
In the governance of nations, the subject of whether military regimes are superior to civilian regimes has remained a topic of debate. While civilian governments are often idealized for their emphasis on democracy and citizens' rights, it is worth considering the potential advantages of military regimes in terms of stability and efficiency. This essay will present arguments supporting the notion that military regimes can be more effective in ensuring stability, maintaining law and order, and efficiently implementing policies compared to civilian regimes.
Argument 1: Stability and Security
Military regimes have a reputation for being disciplined and capable of maintaining stability. The military's hierarchical structure, clear chain of command, and adherence to strict regulations can minimize political unrest and civil disturbances. Civilian governments, on the other hand, are prone to political infighting, corruption, and gridlock, which can destabilize a nation's progress and security.
To substantiate this claim, one can analyze historical examples where countries facing internal strife and conflicts subsequently experienced periods of stability under military rule. Countries like Chile under General Augusto Pinochet and Egypt under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi saw significant improvements in stability and security, which were lacking during their preceding civilian regimes.
Argument 2: Efficiency and Decision-Making
Military regimes are often associated with swift decision-making and effective policy implementation. The streamlined chain of command in military structures allows for quick and efficient decision-making processes. This enables the government to respond swiftly to crises and carry out policies without being hindered by bureaucracy, political negotiations, or lobbying groups that tend to slow down decision-making in civilian regimes.
Additionally, military regimes often implement long-term development plans and efficiently allocate resources to achieve national goals. As the military has an ingrained sense of discipline and duty, it can effectively execute infrastructure projects, economic reforms, and social programs without being swayed by short-term political agendas.
Argument 3: Resistance to External Threats
Military regimes are often perceived as being better equipped to deal with external threats posed by terrorism, insurgency, or hostile neighbors. The military's expertise in defense and security matters can be utilized to protect the nation's interests, preserve territorial integrity, and maintain peace within borders. This can instill a sense of security among citizens and deter potential threats to national sovereignty.
To fortify this argument, one can point to examples like Pakistan, which has experienced numerous military interventions due to regional tensions and the persistent threat of terrorism. The military, being well-versed in tackling security challenges, has been able to effectively combat extremist elements and protect Pakistani citizens from various domestic and international threats.
Counterargument:
While there are compelling arguments in favor of military regimes, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks. Military regimes have often been associated with human rights abuses, suppression of dissent, and limitations on civil liberties. It is crucial, therefore, to strike a balance between ensuring stability and security and upholding democratic values when considering the implementation of military rule.
Conclusion:
Though widely regarded as an undemocratic form of governance, military regimes do offer potential advantages in terms of stability, security, efficiency, and resistance to external threats. While recognizing the potential drawbacks and abuses associated with military rule, it is essential to consider these advantages when weighing the pros and cons of different governing systems. Ultimately, the choice between military and civilian regimes depends on the specific needs and circumstances of each nation.