This question is on the same primary source.

Do you think that this inquest led to improvements in the working conditions for climbing boys? Why or Why not?

Yes, for sure improvements were made in the working conditions for climbing boys. The parliament must have passed laws that disqualified little children from working into chimney sweeps and doing all the other work that they shouldn’t be. It probably took time for the governments to decide on this issue, but I’m sure that they thought for the best about these children. The governments passed out laws that protected these children, from such work.

I doubt if this one incident led to any improvements. Many children were killed on the job. The parents suffered, of course, but injuries and deaths of children were not unexpected.

Here's an interesting paragraph about how child labour gradually ended.

"Explanations for the Decline in Child Labor
There are many opinions regarding the reason(s) for the diminished role of child labor in these industries. Social historians believe it was the rise of the domestic ideology of the father as breadwinner and the mother as housewife, that was imbedded in the upper and middle classes and spread to the working-class. Economic historians argue it was the rise in the standard of living that accompanied the Industrial Revolution that allowed parents to keep their children home. Although mandatory schooling laws did not play a role because they were so late, other scholars argue that families started showing an interest in education and began sending their children to school voluntarily. Finally, others claim that it was the advances in technology and the new heavier and more complicated machinery, which required the strength of skilled adult males, that lead to the decline in child labor in Great Britain. Although child labor has become a fading memory for Britons, it still remains a social problem and political issue for developing countries today."

http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/tuttle.labor.child.britain

thanks, I was confused at first, but thanks to your help now I'm not:-)

To determine if this inquest led to improvements in the working conditions for climbing boys, it would be helpful to examine historical records or research on the topic. Here's how you can go about doing that:

1. Start by researching the specific inquest you mentioned using credible sources such as historical archives, scholarly articles, or books on the subject. Look for primary sources, such as reports or testimonies from the inquest.

2. Analyze the findings and recommendations of the inquest. Look for any evidence of proposed changes to the working conditions for climbing boys. Pay attention to any legislative actions or policy recommendations mentioned.

3. Research the timeline of legislative reforms regarding child labor and workplace safety during the time period of the inquest. Look for any laws or regulations that were passed around the same time or shortly after the inquest.

4. Examine the impact of these laws on the working conditions for climbing boys. Look for evidence of improved safety regulations, minimum age requirements, or other protective measures that may have been implemented.

5. Consider any additional factors that might have influenced improvements in working conditions. For example, public opinion, advocacy movements, or changes in industrial practices could have also played a role in reforming working conditions.

By following these steps and conducting thorough research, you can gather the necessary information to form an informed perspective on whether or not the inquest led to improvements in the working conditions for climbing boys.