Would abolishing child labour be an effective strategy to improve the lives of children? Why or Why not?
I don't know the answer to this questions because I kind of think that this would be a good stragety but at the same time I don't. I think that it would be good if child labour ended because then so many deaths wouldn't occur, and families wouldn't get shattered if something bad occured. At the same time I think that this wouldn't be a good stragety because children would be the only hope to the parents who can't work, to earn a profit. So parents would need their children to produce money for their living, and at a young age they would have to manage such work.
Please list your opinions. Maybe they will help me answer this question much more clearly, thanks
You're on the right track. However, most enlightened societies do forbid children from working in most jobs. Families should be taken care of by the state if the adults can't work.
Children are the future for a society. Today, if they aren't educated, they won't be able to contribute to the improvement of their country.
thanks
It's understandable that you have mixed feelings about whether abolishing child labour would be an effective strategy to improve the lives of children. It's a complex issue with various perspectives to consider. Let's explore some of the key arguments on each side:
Arguments in favor of abolishing child labour:
1. Protection and well-being: Ending child labour would prioritize the safety, health, and education of children, preventing them from engaging in hazardous or exploitative work.
2. Development and empowerment: By allowing children to access education, they can acquire essential knowledge and skills for a better future, breaking the cycle of poverty and improving their prospects for decent work as adults.
3. Human rights: The abolition of child labour aligns with international human rights standards, including the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which emphasize the right to education, protection, and freedom from exploitation.
Arguments against abolishing child labour:
1. Economic considerations: In some cases, families in poverty rely on the income generated by child labour for their basic needs, and removing this income source could destabilize their livelihoods. This viewpoint suggests alternative strategies such as providing financial assistance or job opportunities for parents.
2. Cultural and societal factors: In certain societies, child labour might be deeply rooted in tradition or necessity due to limited employment opportunities or societal norms. Simply banning it without addressing these underlying issues could create further hardships for families.
3. Regulatory challenges: Enforcing laws against child labour can pose significant challenges, especially in developing countries with limited resources and weak governance systems. Implementation and monitoring of such regulations require careful planning and cooperation.
Considering these arguments, determining the effectiveness of abolishing child labour ultimately requires a comprehensive approach that addresses both the immediate needs of children and the underlying causes of child labour. This approach may involve a combination of measures, including social support programs for families, increased access to quality education, and the promotion of decent work opportunities for adults.