Hello, I am from Norway, I am not good in english and I hope someone could help me with this text. I should write about if the wolves should live or not. A letter to the editor. Here is what i've writen so far. PS, it must be in formal english. I wonder if someone could just correct it. Im 16 years old. Thanks in advance :-)
Dear editor
I have read your article and I think it is good but I do not see why the wolves should live instead of the farmers animal. What do we need wolves for? What about the sheep's? Should not they also deserve to live. In other countries many people die because of the wolves, what is going to happen here if the farmers begin to cage the sheep's. Will the wolves start going after children?
If the wolves should live they should live in a sanctuary, because the wolves harass the sheep when they kill them. The butcher takes in consider to annotate as minimalistic suffering as possible when the animals are being slaughtered. With experience, they know how to kill them the fastest and most human way. If this is not the case in Norway then the FSA (Norwegian Food Safety Authority) will stop the butcher.
Morning! Looking at the grammar (and I agree about the wolves):
farmer's animal = possessive, the animal of the farmer & if you want animals = plural = farmer's animals
New sentence required = wolves, What is going to h appen
plural, not sheep's (possessive) but sheep.
how to fix "The butcher" = takes into consideration the suffering when the animals are being slaughtered.
I'm not sure what you want to say about the butcher = does the butcher worry about the sheep?
Here, in Alaska, they are killing all the wolves they can by airplane, just the adults. But that means the "pups" will die without parents to feed them - in the dens. Inhuman, in my book. I understand how farmers feel having their sheep slaughtered by wolves, but protect the sheep OR kill just those wolves. = There's my opinion!
Sra
"I'm not sure what you want to say about the butcher = does the butcher worry about the sheep?"
I want to say that the FSA will stop the butcher doing what he do if he harass the animals. Thanks for helping me :-D
Dear editor,
I have read your article and while I find it informative, I have reservations about the necessity of allowing wolves to live at the expense of farmers' livestock. As a young individual interested in the well-being of both animals and humans, I am concerned about the impact wolves may have on sheep, which also deserve to be protected. Furthermore, in other countries, there have been instances of fatal attacks by wolves. Is it not plausible that similar incidents could occur here if farmers have to resort to confining their sheep? Could this potentially lead to wolves targeting children?
If it is decided that wolves should indeed be allowed to live, it is my belief that they should reside in a sanctuary where they can be closely monitored. This is crucial because wolves can cause distress to the sheep when hunting them. In Norway, butchers are regulated by the FSA (Norwegian Food Safety Authority) and are required to prioritize the welfare of animals during slaughter, aiming for minimal suffering. With adequate training and experience, butchers know how to dispatch animals swiftly and humanely. If these standards are not being met in Norway, it is the responsibility of the FSA to intervene and take appropriate action.
I hope my concerns are taken into consideration in the ongoing discussion about the coexistence of wolves and farmers' livestock. It is important to find a balance that ensures the welfare of both species.
Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]