CRT/205 Final

posted by .

I have two separate arguments and I am wondering if these answers are appropriate for the questions

1. State one argument made by the author.
“Adoption should be advocated as an alternative to abortion for women experiencing an unwanted pregnancy” McFadden states, “Although the media have publicized negative reports about adoption, many childless couples would make excellent parents for unwanted children.” “Giving up a child for adoption is difficult but more ethical than choosing to abort a fetus.”

Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.

Premise: “Although the media have publicized negative reports about adoption, many childless couples would make excellent parents for unwanted children.” Premise: “Giving up a child for adoption is difficult but more ethical than choosing to abort a fetus.” Conclusion: “Adoption should be advocated as an alternative to abortion for women experiencing an unwanted pregnancy”


Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.

I believe the author’s argument is valid, although I don’t think it can be considered sound because one of the premises is based on ethical or moral reasoning. I think this is not a strong argument because the “ethics” of abortion is subjective and cannot be proven as true.

2. State one argument made by the author.

“I can't be the only person who has noticed that the same Administration that supports the family cap—the denial of a modest benefit increase to women who conceive an additional child while on welfare—is about to bestow on all but the richest families a $5,000 tax credit to defray the costs of adoption. Thus, the New Jersey baby who is deemed unworthy of $64 a month, or $768 a year, in government support if he stays in his family of origin immediately becomes six times more valuable once he joins a supposedly better-ordered household.

Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument

Premises: I can't be the only person who has noticed that the same Administration that supports the family cap—the denial of a modest benefit increase to women who conceive an additional child while on welfare—is about to bestow on all but the richest families a $5,000 tax credit to defray the costs of adoption. Conclusion: “Thus, the New Jersey baby who is deemed unworthy of $64 a month, or $768 a year, in government support if he stays in his family of origin immediately becomes six times more valuable once he joins a supposedly better-ordered household.”

Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.

I think this is a valid and strong argument, as the author uses facts to support the conclusion that are true. I am uncertain whether it would be considered sound because I am thinking the conclusion subjective and is not necessarily true.

I really need some guidance on this please!

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. crt

    Fill in the blanks where called for, and answer true or false where appropriate. 1. Valid arguments are said to be strong or weak. 2. Valid arguments are always good arguments. 3. Sound arguments are ________ arguments whose premises …
  2. CRT 205

    The core of the argument against anti-abortion laws is that every woman has a fundamental right to decide what happens to her own body, at least until after the quickening of the fetus. In recent years a few courts have given a sympathetic …
  3. crt 205

    Final Project: Comprehensive Argument Analysis The Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center database at the University Library provides a wealth of arguments to which you can apply your critical thinking skills. Find this database by logging …
  4. CRT 205

    • Read the article “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11” on pp. 456–458 of Appendix 1. • Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument you find. Then, answer the …
  5. CRT

    Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument you find. Then, answer the following questions for each argument, making sure to explain how you arrived at your answers. o Do the …
  6. crt 205

    State one argument made by the author. "President Obama's decision to force American taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions in the District of Columbia will cause the deaths of at least 1,000 more unborn children each year." After …
  7. CRT 205

    Assignment: Argument Evaluation · Read the article “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11” on pp. 456–458 of Appendix 1. · Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument …
  8. crt 205

    I am doing my final on catholic church response to child sexual abuse is inadequate. my question is I am having trouble finding out what is bias, identify any rhetorical devices, moral reasoning, identify the premises and the argument …
  9. critical thinking crt 205

    Choose from the following three topics from the Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Note that there is one article in support and one in opposition listed for each topic. Immigration: Immigration Should Be Restricted. Paul Craig Roberts. …
  10. writing

    1. Identify the thesis statement in the article “Essay: The Communication Collapse.” State specifically where the author placed his thesis statement. 2. Identify the arguments the author made to support his position. 3. Which argument …

More Similar Questions