In what circumstances would each approach to stakeholder impact analysis (moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach) be most useful?
Without knowing the context more specifically, your question is unclear. Please repost with more data. However, you might try this search:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=stakeholder+impact+analysis&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search. Also see http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/.
To determine the most useful approach to stakeholder impact analysis, it is essential to understand the specific circumstances and objectives of the analysis. Here, I will explain when each approach - moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin's approach - would be most suitable:
1. Moral Standards Approach:
This approach evaluates stakeholder impact based on adhering to specific moral principles or ethical standards. Moral standards provide a clear framework for decision-making by considering values such as fairness, justice, or human rights. This approach is most useful when organizations aim to uphold a set of ethical principles and want to assess their impact on stakeholders accordingly.
2. 5-Question Approach:
The 5-question approach involves asking five key questions to analyze stakeholder impact: Who are the stakeholders? What are their interests? How much power do they have? How legitimate are their claims? How urgent are their claims? This approach emphasizes a comprehensive understanding of stakeholders and their needs, and it is best used when organizations seek to identify and prioritize stakeholders' concerns and interests in a systematic manner.
3. Pastin's Approach:
Pastin's approach focuses on balancing stakeholder interests considering ethical constraints and the long-term viability of the organization. It emphasizes decision-making that takes into account stakeholders' interests, but also considers the organization's success and sustainability. This approach is particularly useful when organizations face complex decisions that involve trade-offs between conflicting stakeholder interests.
In summary, the moral standards approach is suited for organizations aiming to apply specific ethical principles, the 5-question approach is useful for identifying and prioritizing stakeholder concerns, and Pastin's approach is beneficial for balancing stakeholder interests with the organization's long-term viability. The choice of approach depends on the organization's goals, the complexity of the situation, and the desired outcome of the stakeholder impact analysis.