can anyone educate me about why france should have the right to nuclear arms?? and be specific about what the arms and rights are? please please please! i need to argue about it. thank you!
Some of your argument may depend a little on where you are.
France is one of the 5 members of the non-proliferation treaty group (NPT) as it was one of the first 5 to detonate a bomb. France was motivated by the Suez Crisis and diplomatic tension between the USSR and the USA. It was keen to retain its great power status, alongside the United Kingdom.
You might want to look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
To look at 'Rights' you might want look at some of the various Bills of Rights, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights
for links.
Why does the US have the right to nuclear arms? Right seems to be a political word, it means what the country asserting the right wants. Arms means: nuclear explosives.
Arguing about this reminds me of Henny Penny. Everyone listened to Henny Penny's argument, but in the end, only Foxy-Loxy gained. In the world of Nuclear Arms, only those that have them can assert their "rights" to keep them.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/eft/eft21.htm
what are some reasons that france have the right to nuclear arms? i know that in general it's for security and power but i don't know the specifics......
Here is the reasoning France has a right to nuclear arms:
1) The French say they do.
2) None of the powerful in the world are willing to take the arms away from France.
3) It has been encoded by the NPT that France has them, and can keep them.
Trying to make a rational argument over a political matter is very much like the argument of Henny Penny, as I stated. The rational arguments don't mean as 1) and 2) as I listed above. Rights only exist as long as you can keep them, you keep them by 1) claiming and asserting them, and 2) no one takes them away from you. If there is ever a legal justificiation, it is because of 1) and 2), not any basis of fundamental God-Given rights.
Certainly! France, as one of the world's nuclear-armed countries, maintains its nuclear arsenal for several reasons. Here are the specific details about France's nuclear arms and the rights associated with them:
1. Security and Defense: France's primary justification for possessing nuclear weapons is to ensure its national security and defense. As a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, it believes that a credible nuclear deterrent serves as a powerful deterrent against potential aggression and helps maintain its independence.
2. Dissuasion: France's nuclear weapons, referred to as the Force de Frappe, are designed for dissuasion or deterrence purposes. In this context, dissuasion means deterring any potential aggressors from initiating a nuclear attack on French territory or interests. By having a robust nuclear capability, France aims to deter adversaries and discourage any hostile actions against it.
3. Strategic Autonomy: France's possession of nuclear arms also enables it to maintain strategic autonomy, which is the ability to act independently in foreign policy and national security matters. By having an independent nuclear deterrent, France enhances its sovereignty and reduces its dependence on other countries for security guarantees.
4. Non-First Use Policy: France has adopted a non-first use policy, meaning it pledges not to use nuclear weapons unless it faces a grave and imminent threat to its vital interests. It reinforces France's commitment to only use nuclear arms as a last resort, emphasizing its defensive nature.
Now, while discussing the argument for France's right to nuclear arms, it is essential to consider some counterarguments as well. Critics argue that:
1. Cost and Allocation of Resources: Some argue that the development, maintenance, and modernization of a nuclear arsenal can be extremely expensive. Critics question whether the significant financial resources allocated to these weapons could be better utilized for other purposes, such as healthcare, education, or addressing climate change.
2. Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Efforts: Critics of France's nuclear arsenal argue that it sets a poor example for disarmament and undermines global non-proliferation efforts. They argue that nuclear weapons reduce overall global security and create incentives for other nations to acquire them.
3. Humanitarian Concerns: There are concerns about the potential humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons, including the loss of civilian lives, long-term environmental damage, and the risk of accidental or unauthorized use. Critics question the ethical implications of possessing weapons of such destructive power.
Remember, these arguments reflect different perspectives on the topic. When discussing why France should have the right to nuclear arms, it is important to consider the different viewpoints and provide a well-rounded analysis.