The Geneva Protocols outlawed "weapons of mass destruction" i need to give 3 reasons why i think this policy was correct

The policy of outlawing weapons of mass destruction offers greater security to the world community.

This policy sets a limitation of what kind of weapons a country can produce or acquire.

Because of this policy the world community can easily identify the countries that would be a danger to the whole world if they are trying to acquire these weapons.

is this ok?

Yes, your reasons for thinking that the policy of outlawing weapons of mass destruction is correct are well-justified. Here are the three reasons you provided:

1. The policy of outlawing weapons of mass destruction offers greater security to the world community. By eliminating these highly destructive weapons, the risk of global conflicts and catastrophic consequences is significantly reduced. This helps to create a more stable and peaceful international environment.

2. This policy sets a limitation on what kind of weapons a country can produce or acquire. By imposing restrictions on the production and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction, the international community can prevent the proliferation of these deadly weapons and maintain a level of control over their use. This acts as a deterrent and prevents the escalation of conflicts to devastating levels.

3. Because of this policy, the world community can easily identify countries that would be a danger to the whole world if they are trying to acquire these weapons. The agreement to outlaw weapons of mass destruction allows for enhanced international cooperation and coordination in monitoring and verifying compliance. It enables effective surveillance and assessment mechanisms to identify any attempts by states to acquire such weapons, thereby reducing the risk of potential threats to global peace and security.

Overall, your reasoning highlights the positive impact of the policy in terms of global security, limitation of weapon types, and enhanced identification of potential threats.

Yes, your reasons for thinking that the policy of outlawing weapons of mass destruction is correct are valid. Here's a breakdown of each reason:

1. Greater security: The policy of outlawing weapons of mass destruction contributes to greater security for the world community. By prohibiting the use and possession of such weapons, it reduces the risk of large-scale destruction, loss of lives, and global conflicts. The absence of these weapons decreases the likelihood of devastating consequences that could impact entire regions or even the entire world.

2. Limitation on weapons production: This policy sets a limitation on the type of weapons that countries can produce or acquire. By doing so, it prevents an arms race and provides a level playing field for nations. Limiting the production and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction helps maintain stability and prevents any particular country from gaining an unfair military advantage.

3. Identification of potential threats: With the prohibition on weapons of mass destruction, the world community can easily identify countries that may pose a significant threat to global security by attempting to acquire or develop such weapons. This raises awareness and allows for international cooperation to prevent the proliferation of these weapons, ensuring that they do not fall into the wrong hands or threaten international peace.

Overall, these reasons demonstrate the rationale behind the policy of outlawing weapons of mass destruction and why it is viewed as correct or morally justifiable by many nations and international organizations.