Can anyone help me with this please?
Describe how you might conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 of Appendix B using each of the stakeholder impact analysis approaches: moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach. This is the scenario.
The mayor of a small seaside town faces a tough decision. A prominent developer has submitted a proposal to build a large mall and resort in the town. This development is estimated to bring $150 million in tourism each year and several hundred new jobs to the community, which badly needs the economic boost. The proposed location of the new development, however, is a site that now houses the only nursing home and senior citizens’ recreation center in the area. Both the nursing home and recreation center would have to be demolished, affecting 100 seniors and 30 employees. There is no other location in town where the new development can be built. How should the mayor decide: in favor of economic prosperity or in defense of his elderly citizens?
To conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 using each of the stakeholder impact analysis approaches, we can start by describing the process for each approach.
1. Moral Standards Approach:
- Identify the stakeholders: In this scenario, the stakeholders include the mayor, the developer, the nursing home residents, the nursing home employees, the senior citizens using the recreation center, the community at large, and the local businesses.
- Determine the moral standards: Identify the moral principles or standards that should guide the decision-making process. Some relevant moral standards in this case could include protecting the welfare of vulnerable populations, promoting economic prosperity, and maintaining fairness in decision-making.
- Assess impacts based on moral standards: Evaluate the potential impacts of the decision on each stakeholder group based on the identified moral standards. Consider the positive impact of economic prosperity against the negative impact on the nursing home residents, employees, and senior citizens.
- Make the decision: Balance the positive and negative impacts, taking into account the moral standards identified, and determine how the mayor should decide.
2. 5-Question Approach:
- Identify the stakeholders: Same as above.
- Ask the 5 questions: For each stakeholder group, ask the following questions:
1. What are the stakeholder's legitimate interests in this decision?
2. What are the stakeholder's power and ability to influence the decision?
3. What are the stakeholder's likely reactions to the decision?
4. What ethical duties does the decision maker have towards the stakeholders?
5. What can the decision maker do to address the stakeholders' concerns?
- Assess impacts based on the 5 questions: Analyze the impacts of the decision on each stakeholder group based on the answers to the 5 questions and the interests and concerns of each group.
- Make the decision: Consider the insights gained from the 5-question analysis and determine how the mayor should decide.
3. Pastin's Approach:
- Identify the stakeholders: Same as above.
- Analyze each stakeholder's values and priorities: Determine the key values and priorities of each stakeholder group, such as economic growth, welfare of elderly citizens, job creation, etc.
- Evaluate potential consequences: Assess the potential consequences of the decision on each stakeholder group's values and priorities. Consider the trade-offs and conflicts between different stakeholder groups.
- Determine the most appropriate action: Weigh the potential consequences and determine the action that aligns with the overall ethical framework. Consider potential compromises or mitigating actions to address any negative consequences.
- Make the decision: Based on the analysis, determine how the mayor should decide.
Note: To provide a detailed step-by-step analysis for each approach, additional information on the moral standards, specific stakeholders' interests, and other relevant factors would be needed.
To conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 using the moral standards approach, you would start by identifying the stakeholders involved in this situation. In this case, the stakeholders are the mayor, the prominent developer, the community members, the seniors in the nursing home, the employees of the nursing home and recreation center, and the potential tourists.
Next, you would evaluate the impact of the proposed development on each stakeholder group based on moral standards. This involves considering the values and principles that are important to society. For example, you might consider the value of economic prosperity and job creation versus the value of caring for the elderly and ensuring their well-being.
You would then weigh the moral implications of each stakeholder group being affected by the decision. In this case, the mayor needs to consider the economic benefits the development would bring to the community, but also the potential harm it would cause to the seniors and employees who would be displaced.
Based on this analysis, the mayor would need to make a decision that takes into account the moral considerations and balance the trade-offs between economic prosperity and the well-being of the elderly citizens.
To conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 using the 5-question approach, you would ask the following questions for each stakeholder:
1. What is the nature of the stakeholder's interest in the decision? In this case, the interests would include economic benefits, job creation, comfort and care for the seniors, and job security for the employees.
2. What is the power or influence of the stakeholder? This involves considering the level of authority or influence each stakeholder has over the decision-making process. For example, the mayor has the power to approve or reject the proposal, while the seniors and employees may have less direct influence.
3. What are the stakeholder's values and concerns related to the decision? This involves identifying the underlying values and concerns of each stakeholder group. The developer may value profit and economic growth, while the seniors and employees may value their well-being and security.
4. What are the likely consequences for each stakeholder based on the decision? This requires evaluating the potential positive and negative impacts on each stakeholder group. For example, the community may benefit from economic prosperity, but the seniors and employees would suffer from displacement and potential job loss.
5. How can the decision be justified to each stakeholder? This involves considering how the decision can be explained and justified to each stakeholder group. The mayor would need to find ways to address the concerns and interests of all stakeholders involved.
To conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 using Pastin's approach, you would follow these steps:
1. Identify the stakeholders: This step is the same as in the previous approaches.
2. Evaluate the impact: Assess the impact of the proposed development on each stakeholder group. Consider the potential benefits and harms that would result from the decision.
3. Evaluate the obligations: Determine the moral obligations or duties towards each stakeholder group. For example, the mayor may have an obligation to ensure the well-being and quality of life for the seniors, while also considering the economic needs of the community.
4. Consider alternatives: Explore possible alternatives that could address the concerns and interests of all stakeholders involved. This might include searching for alternative locations for the development or finding ways to mitigate the negative impacts on the seniors and employees.
5. Make a decision: Based on the analysis of the impacts, obligations, and alternatives, the mayor would need to make a decision that balances the interests and concerns of all stakeholders involved.
Remember, these approaches provide a framework for conducting a stakeholder impact analysis, but the final decision would depend on the mayor's personal judgment and the specific context of the situation.