I am running out of ideas.
Question: Did the climate of civil rights and related protest become so militant after 1965 that it was counterproductive, splintering support for civil rights causes and providing an opening for conservative opposition?
We have talked about the civil rights movement, women's movement, liberation movement, chicano movement, and the student movement.
This climate was not counterproductive, although conservatives did oppose the Civil Rights movement.
I live in a mid-size Michigan city and overheard a conversation between the owner of a local store and a friend. The owner was moaning that if she hired a black, that she would lose a lot of customers who were mostly white. Of course, she was forced to hire blacks -- and guess what? She did not lose customers!
At the outset of the secessionist movement in the South, which states defeated the cooperationist argument that the South should act as a unit?
To determine whether the climate of civil rights and related protests after 1965 became so militant that it was counterproductive, splintering support for civil rights causes and providing an opening for conservative opposition, we need to analyze historical accounts and perspectives on this matter. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to research and form an informed opinion on this question:
1. Understand the historical context: Start by gaining a thorough understanding of the civil rights movement in the United States, particularly the timeline and key events leading up to and after 1965. This will provide important context for understanding the subsequent developments and shifts in the movement.
2. Read primary sources: To understand various perspectives on the question, examine primary sources such as speeches, writings, and testimonies from civil rights leaders, activists, and politicians during and after 1965. Look for any indications of a shift in rhetoric, tone, or strategies employed during this period.
3. Consult secondary sources: Read scholarly articles, books, and analyses by historians, sociologists, political scientists, and other experts who have studied the civil rights movement. Look for differing theories or interpretations of whether the increased militancy had counterproductive consequences.
4. Explore contrasting viewpoints: Engage with different viewpoints and debates surrounding the issue. Look for academic debates, op-eds, or interviews that provide opposing perspectives on the question.
5. Evaluate the evidence: Consider the evidence you have gathered from primary and secondary sources, as well as the various viewpoints you have encountered. Analyze the arguments, look for patterns or consistencies, and critically evaluate the credibility of the sources and the evidence they present.
6. Formulate an opinion: Once you have thoroughly examined the historical context and different viewpoints, you can form your own opinion on whether the militancy of civil rights and related protests after 1965 was counterproductive. Make sure to ground your opinion in evidence and logical reasoning.
Remember, developing a well-informed opinion requires thorough research and critical thinking. It is essential to consider various sources and perspectives to gain a comprehensive understanding of complex historical topics like this one.