Philosophy - Ethics

posted by .

I asked a question yesterday about Immanuel Kant, Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals, and now I have a new question.
I am writing a paper on how Kant is saying that inclinations shouldn't be involved in moral decisions, because inclinations do not lead to moral worth, and such. And I began to question why anyone would give up the strive for happiness by acting on inclinations to act according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time wil that it should become a universal law.
And I can't find any evidence in Kant's work that is convincing enough to prove that it is better to give up the drive for happiness...
Can someone please help me? :)

  • Philosophy - Ethics -

    Although brief, this outline of the groundwork should give you some ideas.
    You have a difficult assignment. I personally never found Kant convincing on the purpose of man...good intentions are not enough of an argument for me.

  • Philosophy - Ethics -

    Thank you so much for all your help! :) I apperciate it soo much!!

    And I agree, he basically says that the good will is the only way humans will have moral worth, Duty + ~Inclination = Good Moral Worth. But then he says there is no way to tell if people are acting on pure duty... And then he rambles on about the kingdom of ends!
    Argh :D

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Ethics

    I am trying to find information on the criticism that Immanuel Kant had for previous ethical theories. Any suggestions...I've found a few places online but I don't understand the language.
  2. Philosophy - Ethics

    I'm trying to write a 2-3 paged essay about a topic that Immanuel Kant covers in his book Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. My working thesis is 'Univeral law of morality can not be based on anything other than duty.' But I …
  3. maths

    Rama Kant has a Gold coin of 150 gms. He distributed 6 1 , 5 3 and 5 1 of the coin to his three daughters. Now how much gold is left with Rama Kant?
  4. Ethics and moral reasoning

    The history of philosophy would describe Immanuel Kant as
  5. ethics please help

    Which of the following is associated with the Heinz dilemma?
  6. ethics

    hich of the following philosophers argued that a moral agent must be detached and impartial in making moral decisions?
  7. ethics

    hich of the following philosophers argued that a moral agent must be detached and impartial in making moral decisions?
  8. ethics

    Which of the following philosophers argued that a moral agent must be detached and impartial in making moral decisions?
  9. Philosophy

    Can someone please explain Immanuel Kant's view on ethics.
  10. philosophy

    What is the notion “good” mean for Kant?

More Similar Questions