What other measurements do sociologist use to measure prejudice besides the IAT? How many are there?
Here are many posts on Jiskha in which this topic was discussed. Please read through them and find information you need.
http://www.jiskha.com/search/?cx=partner-pub-6139709814771217%3Aktl1qf7btav&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=measure+prejudice&sa=SEARCH#893
Sociologists use various measurements to assess prejudice, not limited to the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The number of measurements is not fixed, as researchers constantly develop new tools and adapt existing ones. Here are a few common measurements used by sociologists to assess prejudice:
1. Social Distance Scales: These scales measure an individual's willingness to engage in various degrees of social proximity with members of different social groups. They gauge the degree of social acceptance or exclusion towards specific groups.
2. Bogardus Social Distance Scale: It is a widely used social distance scale that assesses feelings of social acceptance or rejection towards different racial and ethnic groups.
3. Attitude Surveys: Sociologists also employ surveys to measure prejudiced attitudes. These surveys consist of a series of questions that capture an individual's beliefs, opinions, and attitudes towards various groups.
4. Peer Reports: Researchers gather information from peers, friends, or acquaintances to evaluate an individual's prejudiced beliefs or behaviors. These reports can offer insight into how a person's prejudice manifests in social interactions.
5. Observational Studies: Sociologists conduct observations in real-life settings to study and measure prejudice. They observe and document overt prejudiced behaviors, such as discriminatory practices or biased language.
6. Implicit Measures: Beyond the IAT, other implicit measures like the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) or the Evaluative Priming Task (EPT) are utilized to capture automatic, subconscious biases that people may not be aware of or may not express explicitly.
It is important to note that these measurements are not exhaustive but represent a sample of commonly used approaches in studying prejudice. Researchers employ a combination of multiple measures to provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of prejudice.