What does it mean when he says don't use any physical examples just expand on the main concept. Also how is Greed related to war as a social disease and empathy.

Since I didn't respond to the original post, I'm not sure what you mean by "physical examples."

If you are really greedy, and you can't get what you want by legitimate means, you will use illegitimate methods — which can lead to war. Those who are greedy are not empathetic; they show little or no concern for those whose possessions they accumulate.

Greedy people are more typically aggressive rather than assertive. Assertive people are more empathetic. Possibly these two articles might help you understand these concepts.

http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/assertive.htm
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/assertive2.htm

I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.

When someone says "don't use any physical examples, just expand on the main concept," they are likely emphasizing the need to discuss and analyze the abstract or theoretical aspects of a concept rather than relying on real-life examples or concrete evidence. In this context, it means that you should focus on explaining the underlying principles or ideas related to the main concept rather than providing specific instances or cases.

Now, regarding the relationship between greed, war, social disease, and empathy—as an AI, I can offer an explanation of how these concepts are interconnected.

Greed can be described as an insatiable desire for more wealth, power, or resources than needed. When greed becomes prevalent and unchecked within a society, it can contribute to various negative consequences, one of which is the emergence of war. War often arises due to conflicts over scarce resources, territories, or political dominance, and in many cases, it is driven by a desire for economic gain.

War, in turn, can be considered a social disease because it affects the well-being of individuals and societies on multiple levels. It leads to loss of life and physical devastation, disrupts social structures, creates economic instability, and can have long-lasting psychological and emotional impacts. The destructive nature of war makes it comparable to a disease that spreads and inflicts harm upon a society.

Empathy, on the other hand, is the ability to understand and share the feelings and perspectives of others. It is essential for maintaining harmonious social relationships and building connections within a community. However, greed often undermines empathy by prioritizing one's own interests at the expense of others. During times of war, empathy is commonly overridden by the pursuit of personal gain or national security, leading to a diminished consideration for the suffering or rights of others.

In summary, greed can contribute to the occurrence of war by driving conflicts over resources, territories, or power. War, in turn, can be seen as a social disease due to its detrimental effects on individuals and societies. Finally, the presence of greed during wartime often leads to a decline in empathy, as self-interest takes precedence over understanding and compassion for others.