SUVs are apartment homes on wheels (a rhetorical definition).
Said by a student who is new to honors classes and struggling with them: ¿I would have aced that test if I weren¿t in a class full of brainiacs. They studied too much and ruined the curve!¿ (a rhetorical explanation)
Post your response to the following: How can a person distinguish between the
prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices? Provide an example of each
Here are answers already given for this question.
http://www.jiskha.com/search/?cx=partner-pub-6139709814771217%3Aktl1qf7btav&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=rhetorical+devices&sa=SEARCH#1335
To distinguish between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices, it is important to understand the intention behind their usage. Rhetorical devices are techniques used to persuade or argue a point effectively. Whether they are prejudicial or nonprejudicial depends on whether they are being used to promote fairness and clarity or to manipulate and demean others.
A nonprejudicial use of a rhetorical device would involve using it in a fair and objective manner, without causing harm or bias towards any particular group or individual. For example:
Statement: "Exercising regularly can lead to a healthier lifestyle, improved physical fitness, and increased longevity."
In this example, the speaker uses rhetorical devices, such as listing multiple benefits, to persuade the audience to consider regular exercise as a positive choice. Their intention is to present factual information without targeting or demeaning any specific group.
On the other hand, prejudicial use of rhetorical devices involves employing them to promote unfair stereotypes, discrimination, or biases against certain groups. Here's an example:
Statement: "People from that ethnicity are inherently lazy and untrustworthy."
In this case, the speaker is using a rhetorical device (generalization) to unfairly stereotype an entire ethnic group. Such prejudicial use of a rhetorical device serves to promote discrimination and is harmful.
In summary, distinguishing between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices depends on the fairness, objectivity, and intention behind their usage. Nonprejudicial use aims to present arguments or persuade impartially, while prejudicial use perpetuates biases and discrimination.
A person can distinguish between the prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices by considering the intentions and impact of the rhetoric in question.
Prejudicial use of rhetorical devices involves using language or rhetoric in a way that promotes bias, discrimination, or stereotypes. It may seek to manipulate or influence others by appealing to their emotions and prejudices. An example of prejudicial use of a rhetorical device is using loaded language or stereotypes to attack a particular group of people. For instance, if someone says, "All immigrants are criminals and should be deported," they are making a prejudicial statement that uses rhetorical devices to unfairly target a specific group.
On the other hand, nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices focuses on effectively communicating ideas or perspectives without promoting discrimination or bias. It may engage the audience through persuasive techniques, such as appealing to logic, ethics, or emotions, but without degrading or unfairly targeting individuals or groups. An example of nonprejudicial use of a rhetorical device is a persuasive speech advocating for equal rights, where the speaker uses emotional appeal and logical reasoning to convince the audience about the importance of equality and fairness.
In summary, distinguishing between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices requires examining both the intent and impact of the language or rhetoric being used. Prejudicial use promotes bias and discrimination, while nonprejudicial use focuses on effective communication without targeting specific groups unfairly.