1. The Filipino insurrection led by the Aquinaldo was the result of

a. the senate vote ratyfing the treaty of paris ending the spanish american war
b. the extension of american military occupation of manila to the entire archipelago

2. The american fighting during the spanish civil war was handicapped by all of the following except
a. an unwilligness to engage in hard fighting
b. antiquated equipment

3.Which best describes the US foreign relations or policies for the entire 19th cnetury
a. american foreign policy frequently became entwined in the issues raised by conflicts between european powers
b. the united states maintained a small military and naval establishment because of our preoccupation afforded by the oceans and the existance of weak neighbors on our borders
c. we protected north, central, and south america against european conquer

I think 1 is A, 2 is B and 3 is C

for 1 im not sure for 2 i think its b and for 3 its c

can someone else please help me

So for number 1 I would go with b... question 2 I went with b because "antiquated" means old fashioned and wedidn't have old equipment to handicap us...and question 3... I'm sorry I'm not sure about that one but I'll try looking for it! When I find the answer I'll let you know if you still need help!

why is 1 B didn't they rebel because the us refused to give the filipinos their indepdence

I looked in my AP American textbook and it says that "The liberty-loving Filipinos assumed that they, like the Cubans, would be granted their freedom after the Spanish-American War. They were tragically deceived. Washington excluded them from the peace negotiations with Spain and made clear its intention to stay in the Philippines indefinitely. Bitterness toward the occupying American troops erupted into open insurrection on February 4, 1899, under Emilio Aguinaldo." So that's why I would say that number 1 is b. I hope that helps you out!

hey so for question 3 i would go with a b/c while North, Central and South America against European conquest with the Monroe Doctrine...it wasn't what we did for the ENTIRE 19th century. We got involved with Hawaii, Latin America, and Cuba...all countries that were having conflicts with European powers. So I'd say a is the answer! Sorry that took me a while! :)

To confirm the correct answers, let's break down the questions and their options individually:

1. The Filipino insurrection led by Aquinaldo was the result of:
a. The senate vote ratifying the Treaty of Paris ending the Spanish-American War.
b. The extension of American military occupation of Manila to the entire archipelago.

To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the context. The Treaty of Paris ended the Spanish-American War and transferred the Philippines from Spanish control to American control. As per option a, the Senate vote ratified this treaty. However, it is important to note that Aquinaldo's insurrection was actually a response to the second option, the extension of American military occupation to the entire archipelago. Therefore, the correct answer is b.

2. American fighting during the Spanish Civil War was handicapped by all of the following except:
a. Unwillingness to engage in hard fighting.
b. Antiquated equipment.

To identify the correct answer, we need to analyze the options. Option a suggests that the American fighters were unwilling to engage in hard fighting, while option b suggests they had antiquated equipment. The question asks for the option that does NOT handicap the American fighting. Based on historical knowledge, the American fighters actually experienced difficulties due to their lack of relevant equipment, so the correct answer is b.

3. Which best describes U.S. foreign relations or policies for the entire 19th century:
a. American foreign policy frequently became entwined in the issues raised by conflicts between European powers.
b. The United States maintained a small military and naval establishment because of our preoccupation afforded by the oceans and the existence of weak neighbors on our borders.
c. We protected North, Central, and South America against European conquest.

To determine the correct answer, we need to evaluate the options individually. Option a suggests that American foreign policy frequently became entangled in European conflicts, option b states that the U.S. maintained a small military and naval establishment due to geographical advantages, and option c implies that the U.S. protected the Americas against European conquest.

Looking at the history of the 19th century, it is evident that the U.S. did not frequently become entwined in European conflicts (option a). Additionally, the U.S. did not necessarily protect all of North, Central, and South America against European conquest (option c).

Based on historical records, it is accurate to say that the U.S. maintained a small military and naval establishment due to its geographical advantages, such as oceans providing a level of protection and having weak neighbors (option b). Therefore, the correct answer is b.

In summary, the correct answers are:
1. b. The extension of American military occupation of Manila to the entire archipelago.
2. b. Antiquated equipment.
3. b. The United States maintained a small military and naval establishment because of our preoccupation afforded by the oceans and the existence of weak neighbors on our borders.