many judges in the criminal court system are not only overwork, but also must contend with the worst of soceity. How does the role and responsibility of a judge differ in a real-life courtroom as opposed to the mystique portrayed in the movies or on television?
http://www.jiskha.com/search/?cx=partner-pub-6139709814771217%3Aktl1qf7btav&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=judges#1045
Be sure to read the other posts and answers on this topic from earlier dates on Jiskha. Then write up what YOU THINK, and someone here will be happy to comment on your ideas.
The role and responsibility of a judge in a real-life courtroom can differ significantly from the portrayal in movies or on television. While fictional depictions may emphasize dramatic moments and captivating storylines, real-life judges are primarily focused on maintaining fairness, upholding the law, and ensuring a fair trial. Here are some key differences between the two:
1. Caseload and workload: In real life, judges often have heavy caseloads and are responsible for managing numerous cases simultaneously. Unlike the movies, where a judge may preside over a single thrilling case, real-life judges need to handle a myriad of criminal, civil, and administrative cases, leading to immense workload and the potential for stress and overwork.
2. Interaction with the worst of society: Real-life judges frequently deal with individuals who have committed serious crimes or engaged in undesirable behavior. They encounter the harsh realities and complexities of criminal behavior, making important decisions about bail, sentencing, and determining guilt or innocence. Unlike the limited interactions shown in movies or TV shows, judges have challenging responsibilities in evaluating evidence, listening to testimonies, and providing a judgment based on the law.
3. Legal and procedural framework: Movies and television often simplify the legal process for storytelling purposes, whereas real-life courtroom procedures adhere to formal rules and legal principles. Judges must ensure that the legal rights of all parties are protected, follow prescribed courtroom procedures, and make impartial decisions based on applicable laws and legal precedents. It's not just about making dramatic statements or rendering instant judgments, but rather carefully considering evidence, applying legal principles, and respecting due process.
4. Limited personal involvement: Contrary to some dramatic portrayals, real-life judges maintain a degree of impartiality and detachment from the proceedings. They cannot have personal or emotional involvement with the cases or parties involved, ensuring that their decisions are based on facts and legal arguments rather than personal biases or vendettas.
5. Administrative role: Outside the courtroom, judges also have administrative duties. These tasks include managing court calendars, presiding over pre-trial conferences, assigning cases to other judges or magistrates, and overseeing court operations.
It's essential to recognize that while movies and television shows can be entertaining, they often embellish or simplify aspects of the legal system for dramatic effect. Understanding the realities of a judge's role in a real-life courtroom helps dispel misconceptions and appreciate the complexities and challenges they face while upholding justice.