How can a person distinguish between the prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices?
http://www.jiskha.com/search/?cx=partner-pub-6139709814771217%3Aktl1qf7btav&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=prejudicial+and+nonprejudicial+use+of+rhetorical&sa=SEARCH#1085
Scroll down past the ads at the top and go through all the different posts. There are some good answers to this question in there.
Debra you might have more help at a website called student of fortune, just search for it I'm sure it will come up. I have gotten help from barbdog12 on this same subject and got an A.
To distinguish between the prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices, one needs to understand the purpose and effect of these devices in communication. Here are some steps to help you make this distinction:
1. Understand the definition of rhetorical devices: Rhetorical devices are techniques used in language to effectively convey messages, persuade, or create emphasis. Some common examples include metaphors, analogies, rhetorical questions, and hyperbole.
2. Analyze the context: Examine the overall messaging, tone, and intent behind the use of the rhetorical device. Consider the speaker's motivations, audience, and the subject matter at hand. This will help shed light on whether the device is being used to manipulate or inform, to promote prejudice or fairness.
3. Evaluate the intended effect: Determine the impact the use of the rhetorical device has on the audience. Does it appeal to emotions, reason, or both? Is it employed to provoke critical thinking, empathy, or biased judgment? A nonprejudicial use would aim for reasoned persuasion or fostering an open dialogue, while a prejudicial use might try to reinforce stereotypes, manipulate emotions, or encourage discrimination.
4. Consider fairness and inclusivity: Assess whether the rhetorical device contributes to a fair and inclusive conversation or reinforces biases and prejudices. Nonprejudicial use seeks to engage a diverse audience, respects the dignity of all individuals, and promotes equality. Prejudicial use, on the other hand, may perpetuate stereotypes, discrimination, or marginalization.
5. Critically analyze the language and framing: Pay attention to the specific words, phrases, or imagery used within the rhetorical device. Are they neutral and objective, or do they have a biased or inflammatory connotation? Nonprejudicial language relies on factual accuracy, while prejudicial language may rely on subjective judgments, stereotypes, or stereotypes.
Remember that the distinction between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices is subjective and can depend on factors such as cultural context, personal biases, and individual interpretation. It is crucial to approach this analysis with an open mind, critical thinking, and sensitivity to multiple perspectives.