What parallel patterns do the law of april 6 and the intolerable acts have in common? How are they different?
You'll find several differences and similarities in these sites.
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/LL/ngl1.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intolerable_Acts
http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/wwww/us/intolerableactsdef.htm
To determine the parallel patterns and differences between the Law of April 6 and the Intolerable Acts, we first need to understand what these two historical events were.
1. Law of April 6: The Law of April 6, also known as the April 6th Reform, was implemented in 1830 in Mexico by General Santa Anna. This law abolished the Mexican Constitution of 1824 and centralized power in the hands of the Mexican president. It aimed to strengthen the Mexican government's control over Texas, including taxation and immigration policies.
2. Intolerable Acts: The Intolerable Acts, also called the Coercive Acts, were a series of punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in response to the Boston Tea Party in 1774. These acts aimed to assert British authority over the rebellious American colonies in America and punish Massachusetts for its defiance.
Parallel Patterns:
1. Centralized Authority: Both the Law of April 6 and the Intolerable Acts sought to centralize authority and control. The Law of April 6 centralized power in the hands of the Mexican president, while the Intolerable Acts centralized authority in the British government.
2. Restrictive Measures: Both sets of laws imposed restrictive measures on the affected regions. The Law of April 6 imposed strict immigration policies and taxation on Texas, while the Intolerable Acts restricted trade and imposed martial law in Massachusetts.
3. Resistance and Rebellion: Both the Law of April 6 and the Intolerable Acts sparked resistance and rebellion among the affected populations. Texans, particularly American settlers, opposed the Law of April 6 and ultimately fought for Texas independence. The Intolerable Acts led to increased tensions and eventually played a significant role in triggering the American Revolution.
Differences:
1. Context and Timeframe: The Law of April 6 was enacted in 1830, while the Intolerable Acts were passed in 1774. They occurred in different historical periods and within distinct frameworks.
2. Geographic Scope: The Law of April 6 specifically targeted Texas as a region within Mexico, aiming to tighten control over this particular area. In contrast, the Intolerable Acts were directed at the entire Massachusetts colony in America.
3. Motivations: The motivations behind these acts differ. The Law of April 6 aimed to maintain central authority and control over Texas, while the Intolerable Acts were a punitive response by the British government to the Boston Tea Party in order to assert control over the rebellious American colonies.
To summarize, both the Law of April 6 and the Intolerable Acts sought to centralize authority, imposed restrictive measures, and faced resistance and rebellion. However, they differed in terms of context, geographic scope, and motivations.