What did the mayflower compact and the fundamental orders of connecticut have in common?
they was both in connectuict
Were not both the first constitutions of groups moving to the colonies?
The Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut are both significant documents in American history that share a few similarities:
1. Self-Government: Both documents outlined a form of self-governance. The Mayflower Compact established a simple government based on consensus and majority rule among the passengers aboard the Mayflower ship, who were seeking a new colony in America. The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, adopted by the Connecticut Colony in 1639, created a more complex form of democratic government, establishing a system of electing representatives and outlining the powers and limitations of the government.
2. Origins in New England: Both documents originated in New England during the early colonial period. The Mayflower Compact was signed by the Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower ship off the coast of Cape Cod in 1620, establishing the Plymouth Colony. The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were written by the residents of the Connecticut Colony, which became a separate entity in 1636.
3. Development of Democratic Principles: Both documents contributed to the development of democratic principles in America. The Mayflower Compact introduced the idea of consent and agreement among the governed, emphasizing the importance of collective decision-making. The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut expanded on this concept, introducing a more formalized system of representative government.
To find more specific details about the Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, you can consult historical sources such as books, articles, or reputable websites. These sources will provide a deeper understanding of the context, content, and impact of each document.