What was Jefferson's and Jackson's stance on the Warren Brdge v. Charles River Bridge case?

Jefferson died seven years or so before the case was decided. I am not certain he was consulted.

Jackson was a democrat, and he viewed the decision as a victory for the public.

Thomas Jefferson did not have a direct stance on the Warren Bridge v. Charles River Bridge case, as it occurred after his presidency. However, he believed in the importance of progress and development and likely would have supported the concept of competition leading to improvement.

Andrew Jackson, on the other hand, was more closely associated with the case. In the 1837 case of Warren Bridge v. Charles River Bridge, the Charles River Bridge Company sought to prevent the construction of a new bridge - the Warren Bridge - which they claimed violated their exclusive charter rights. The case dealt with the conflict between private property rights and public interest.

Jackson's stance on the case was in favor of the Warren Bridge. He believed in the principles of democratic capitalism, which include encouraging competition and promoting public welfare over private interests. His argument in this case reflected his support for progress and the needs of the larger community, rather than preserving monopoly rights for a select few.

To verify this information and gain a deeper understanding of Jefferson's and Jackson's stances, you could consult historical documents, such as their writings, correspondence, or speeches. Additionally, scholarly articles or books that analyze their political philosophies and actions during their respective presidencies can provide insights into their likely positions on the Warren Bridge v. Charles River Bridge case.