Compare the early and contempororary theories of intelligence. I need help with this one please

The real problem you have is not the theories, but actually defining what intelligence is. Few have agreed what it means.

http://psychology.about.com/od/cognitivepsychology/p/intelligence.htm

yes, the problem is theories. I can not find them anywhere and I know they are around.

Dawn -- what does your text say about early and contemporary theories of intelligence?

How early is "early?" Ancient Greek times? Medieval times? Early 1900s?

Are contemporary theories of intelligence those that have become publicized in the last 10 years? 20 years?

I searched Google under the key words "intelligence theory" to get these possible sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triarchic_theory_of_intelligence
http://www.indiana.edu/~intell/
http://www.personalityresearch.org/intelligence.html

There are many other sources out there.

In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search. Also see http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/.

I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.

To compare the early and contemporary theories of intelligence, you'll need to understand the fundamental aspects of each theory, how they differ, and the key researchers associated with each theory. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how you can approach this task:

1. Begin by researching early theories of intelligence:
- Early theories predominantly focused on the idea of general intelligence, also known as "g factor." Key early theorists include Charles Spearman, who proposed the concept of general intelligence, and Alfred Binet, who developed the first intelligence test.

2. Next, explore the contemporary theories of intelligence:
- Contemporary theories have moved away from the idea of a single general intelligence factor and embrace multiple intelligences. Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences is one of the prominent contemporary theories. It suggests that there are different forms of intelligence, such as linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic intelligence.

3. Compare the key aspects of the early and contemporary theories:
- Early theories primarily focused on cognitive abilities, emphasizing a single general intelligence factor.
- Contemporary theories consider a broader range of abilities, highlighting the diverse ways in which individuals can excel and be intelligent.
- Early theories often relied on IQ tests as a measure of intelligence, whereas contemporary theories highlight the importance of multiple measures and emphasize that intelligence is not solely determined by performance on a test.

4. Analyze the differences between the early and contemporary theories:
- Early theories provided a more narrow view of intelligence, while contemporary theories offer a more comprehensive understanding.
- Early theories placed a heavy emphasis on a single cognitive ability, whereas contemporary theories recognize and value multiple forms of intelligence.
- Early theories often focused on static, innate IQ scores, while contemporary theories recognize the potential for developing and nurturing different intelligences.

By following these steps, you can effectively compare the early and contemporary theories of intelligence. Remember to gather information from reputable sources, such as academic journals, books, or research papers, to ensure accuracy and depth in your analysis.