what is pseudo-psychology
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/397695/learning_the_difference_between_psychology.html
Here is another article:
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/PsychPseudo.html
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
Pseudo-psychology refers to theories, beliefs, or practices that claim to be based on psychological principles but are not supported by scientific evidence or accepted by mainstream psychology. These ideas often lack rigor and are based on anecdotal evidence, personal testimonies, or intuition, rather than empirical research.
To understand what pseudo-psychology is, it is helpful to first understand what real psychology is. Psychology is the scientific study of the mind, behavior, and mental processes. It relies on the scientific method, which involves formulating hypotheses, conducting controlled experiments, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions based on evidence.
Unlike real psychology, pseudo-psychology often lacks scientific validity, reliability, and objectivity. It can encompass a wide range of ideas, such as astrology, phrenology, graphology, and various forms of "alternative" therapies, among others. These ideas may appear to have psychological or therapeutic aspects, but they generally lack empirical evidence to support their claims.
To identify pseudo-psychology, it is important to critically evaluate claims and examine whether they are backed by scientific research. Look for the following red flags:
1. Lack of empirical evidence: Pseudo-psychological claims often lack rigorous scientific studies or rely on anecdotal evidence as proof.
2. Overgeneralizations: Pseudo-psychology tends to make sweeping claims that apply to all individuals without considering individual differences or cultural contexts.
3. Confirmation bias: Pseudo-psychological theories often seek to confirm pre-existing beliefs or personal experiences rather than objectively examining evidence.
4. Reliance on subjective experiences: Pseudo-psychology may heavily rely on personal testimonials or anecdotal evidence without considering the role of bias or other external factors.
5. Absence of peer-reviewed research: Genuine scientific research undergoes rigorous review by experts in the field, and findings are published in reputable scientific journals. Pseudo-psychology often lacks this scientific scrutiny.
When encountering claims related to psychology, it is important to critically evaluate their sources, evidence, and adherence to established scientific principles. Relying on reputable scientific research and consulting qualified professionals in the field is crucial for a valid understanding of psychology.